Mechanisms without mechanistic explanation

Synthese:1-18 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Some recent accounts of constitutive relevance have identified mechanism components with entities that are causal intermediaries between the input and output of a mechanism. I argue that on such accounts there is no distinctive inter-level form of mechanistic explanation and that this highlights an absence in the literature of a compelling argument that there are such explanations. Nevertheless, the entities that these accounts call ‘components’ do play an explanatory role. Studying causal intermediaries linking variables Xand Y provides knowledge of the counterfactual conditions under which X will continue to bring about Y. This explanatory role does not depend on whether intermediate variables count as components. The question of whether there are distinctively mechanistic explanations remains open.

Other Versions

reprint Weinberger, Naftali (2019) "Mechanisms without mechanistic explanation". Synthese 196(6):2323-2340

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,880

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Constitutive Explanatory Relevance.Carl Craver - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32:3-20.
A Categorical Formalism of Mechanism.Jinyeong Gim - 2021 - Dissertation, Seoul National University
A Model of Causal, Statistical Explanation in Evolutionary Biology.Bruce David Glymour - 1995 - Dissertation, University of California, San Diego
Mechanistic Abstraction.Worth Boone & Gualtiero Piccinini - 2016 - Philosophy of Science 83 (5):686-697.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-09-04

Downloads
81 (#261,514)

6 months
10 (#444,744)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Naftali Weinberger
Tilburg Center For Logic, Ethics, And Philosophy Of Science (TiLPS - Tilburg University)