Can epistemology help? The problem of the kentucky-Fried rats

Social Epistemology 18 (1):51 – 58 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This Article does not have an abstract

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/0269172042000249372

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Will the real Charles Fried please stand up?Paul B. Miller & Charles Weijer - 2003 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (4):353-357.
Intentions, Rights and Wrongs.Marilyn Fischer - 1984 - Philosophy Research Archives 10:239-247.
“[A]re Norway Rats... Things?”: Diversity Versus Generality in the Use of Albino Rats in Experiments on Development and Sexuality. [REVIEW]Cheryl A. Logan - 2001 - Journal of the History of Biology 34 (2):287 - 314.
Apes ape!Deborah Custance - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):118-119.
Of Rats and Women: Fetal Sexuality and Hybrid Agency.Alice Adams - 2004 - Journal of Medical Humanities 25 (3):205-221.
Fried on Rights and Moral Personality. [REVIEW]William A. Parent - 1979 - Ethics 90 (1):141 - 156.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
34 (#470,159)

6 months
4 (#790,314)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark Webb
Texas Tech University

Citations of this work

Guidance and mainstream epistemology.Jeremy Fantl - 2023 - Philosophical Studies 180 (7):2191-2210.
Trust and contextualism.Snjezana Prijic-Samarzija - 2007 - Acta Analytica 22 (2):125-138.
Evidencijalizam i povjerenje.Snježana Prijić-Samaržija - 2007 - Filozofska Istrazivanja 27 (3):671-683.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Why I Know About As Much As You: A Reply to Hardwig.Mark Owen Webb - 1993 - Journal of Philosophy 90 (5):260-270.

Add more references