Will the real Charles Fried please stand up?

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (4):353-357 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

: In response to the preceding commentary by Jerry Menikoff in this issue of the Journal , the authors argue that Fried's central concern is not that randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are conducted without consent, but rather that various aspects of the design and conduct of RCTs are in tension with physicians' duties of personal care to their patients. Although Fried does argue that the existence of equipoise cannot justify failure to obtain consent from research subjects, informed consent by itself does not supplant ill subjects' rights to personalized judgment and care embodied in Fried's equipoise

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The real problem with equipoise.Winston Chiong - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (4):37 – 47.
Equipoise: Beyond rehabilitation?Jerry Menikoff - 2003 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (4):347-351.
Rehabilitating Equipoise.Paul B. Miller & Charles Weijer - 2003 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (2):93-118.
Clinical equipoise and the incoherence of research ethics.Franklin G. Miller & Howard Brody - 2007 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (2):151 – 165.
Intentions, Rights and Wrongs.Marilyn Fischer - 1984 - Philosophy Research Archives 10:239-247.
Pulling the plug on clinical equipoise: A critique of Miller and Weijer.Fred Gifford - 2007 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (3):203-226.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
60 (#262,432)

6 months
17 (#141,290)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Charles Weijer
University of Western Ontario

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references