- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Consumer alert: Ethical issues raised by the sale of genetic tests directly to consumers
American Journal of Bioethics 8 (6):16 – 18 (2008)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Consumer ethics: An assessment of individual behavior in the market place. [REVIEW]Sam Fullerton, Kathleen B. Kerch & H. Robert Dodge - 1996 - Journal of Business Ethics 15 (7):805 - 814.
Challenges for corporate ethics in marketing genetic tests.Bryn Williams-Jones & Vural Ozdemir - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 77 (1):33 - 44.
The approval of over-the-counter HIV tests: Playing fair when making the rules. [REVIEW]Melissa Whellams - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 77 (1):5 - 15.
Consumer ethics: An investigation of the ethical beliefs of elderly consumers. [REVIEW]Scott J. Vitell, James R. Lumpkin & Mohammed Y. A. Rawwas - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (5):365 - 375.
Negativity bias in consumer price response to ethical information.Dirk C. Moosmayer - 2012 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 21 (2):198-208.
The Impact of Intrinsic Religiosity on Consumers' Ethical Beliefs: Does It Depend on the Type of Religion? A Comparison of Christian and Moslem Consumers in Germany and Turkey. [REVIEW]Helmut Schneider, John Krieger & Azra Bayraktar - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 102 (2):319-332.
Consumer ethics: The possible effects of terrorism and civil unrest on the ethical values of consumers. [REVIEW]Mohammed Y. A. Rawwas, Scott J. Vitell & Jamal A. Al-Khatib - 1994 - Journal of Business Ethics 13 (3):223 - 231.
Suggested management responses to ethical issues raised by technological change.William P. Cordeiro - 1997 - Journal of Business Ethics 16 (12-13):1393-1400.
Consumer Religiosity: Consequences for Consumer Activism in the United States. [REVIEW]Krist Swimberghe, Laura A. Flurry & Janna M. Parker - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 103 (3):453-467.
The ethical challenges of direct-to-consumer genetic testing.Cheryl Berg & Kelly Fryer-Edwards - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 77 (1):17 - 31.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
19 (#799,653)
6 months
1 (#1,471,551)
2009-01-28
Downloads
19 (#799,653)
6 months
1 (#1,471,551)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Direct-to-Consumer Genomics and Research Ethics: Should a More Robust Informed Consent Process Be Included?Katherine Wasson - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6-7):56-58.
References found in this work
Direct to confusion: Lessons learned from marketing brca testing.Ellen Matloff & Arthur Caplan - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (6):5 – 8.
Let the consumer decide? The regulation of commercial genetic testing.Mairi Levitt - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (6):398-403.
Let the consumer decide? The regulation of commercial genetic testing.D. M. Levitt - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (6):398-403.
Direct-to-consumer online genetic testing and the four principles: an analysis of the ethical issues.Katherin Wasson, E. David Cook & K. Helzlsouer - 2005 - Ethics and Medicine 22 (2).
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5ff6c685cb-rv6xt uwo