“Defeaters” don't matter

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 41 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Defeasibility Theory.Thomas Grundmann - 2011 - In Sven Bernecker & Duncan Pritchard (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Epistemology. Routledge. pp. 156-166.
Pollock and Sturgeon on defeaters.Albert Casullo - 2018 - Synthese 195 (7):2897-2906.
Unjustified Defeaters.David Alexander - 2017 - Erkenntnis 82 (4):891-912.
Undefeated dualism.Tomas Bogardus - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (2):445-466.
Defeasibility and Inferential Particularism.Javier González de Prado Salas - 2017 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 25 (1):80-98.
Warrant, defeaters, and the epistemic basis of religious belief.Christoph Jäger - 2005 - In Michael G. Parker and Thomas M. Schmidt (ed.), Scientific explanation and religious belief. Mohr Siebeck. pp. 81-98.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-04-05

Downloads
57 (#279,185)

6 months
9 (#300,363)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Edouard Machery
University of Pittsburgh
Zina B. Ward
Florida State University

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Intention.P. L. Heath - 1960 - Philosophical Quarterly 10 (40):281.
Engaging Reason.Joseph Raz - 1999 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (3):745-748.
Deliberation and Acting for Reasons.Nomy Arpaly & Timothy Schroeder - 2012 - Philosophical Review 121 (2):209-239.

Add more references