In Defense of Socrates

Review of Metaphysics 25 (2):311-325 (1971)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Against the position of professor rex martin ("the review of metaphysics," xxv, December 1971) it is argued that there is a conceptual link between disobedience and destruction of authority, As socrates argues; that socrates does not take obedience to law to be an absolute principle of action; that socrates in the two dialogues about his trial does not contradict himself on the question of obedience to the court; that socrates' argument from piety does not undermine his arguments from injury and agreement.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
4 (#1,013,551)

6 months
18 (#821,922)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

In and Out of Character: Socratic Mimēsis.Mateo Duque - 2020 - Dissertation, Cuny Graduate Center
What is civil disobedience?J. Angelo Corlett - 1997 - Philosophical Papers 26 (3):241-259.
Socrates and Superiority.Nathan Hanna - 2007 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (2):251-268.
The Structure of The Laws' Speech In Plato's Crito.M. Dyson - 1978 - Classical Quarterly 28 (2):427-436.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references