The Limited Role of Social Sciences and Humanities in Interdisciplinary Funding: What are Its Effects?

Social Epistemology 38 (2):152-172 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There is wide agreement among scholars in research policy that the position of the social sciences and humanities (SSH) in interdisciplinary research is not as good as it should be. Academics give many reasons why SSH fields should become more active collaborators in interdisciplinarity, including the capacity within these disciplines to introduce new research questions and to make interdisciplinary research more ethically and societally grounded. This article assesses the conditions attached to 127 recent funding programmes for interdisciplinary and crossdisciplinary research. The findings indicate that the exclusion of SSH from interdisciplinary fields is an ongoing problem in research funding. Furthermore, when given funding, SSH disciplines are less likely to be given the opportunity to connect their research questions and targets solely to the advancement of knowledge. These priorities increase the likelihood of SSH disciplines contributing to multidisciplinary research rather than focusing on interdisciplinarity with knowledge integration.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Fruits, Salads, and Smoothies: A Working Definition of Interdisciplinarity.Moti Nissani - 1995 - Journal of Educational Thought 29:29: 119-126 (1995).
How and Why to Teach Interdisciplinary Research Practice.Rick Szostak - 2007 - Journal of Research Practice 3 (2):Article M17.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-09-08

Downloads
27 (#576,365)

6 months
19 (#182,085)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Anita Välikangas
University of Helsinki

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations