A straw man's neogenome

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):380 - 381 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The neogenome has indeed changed how to understand the relationship between genotype and phenotype. However, this does not imply a paradigm shift, but simply a normal development of a young science. Charney creates a straw man out of the myth of an immutable genetics, and conveys the wrong idea that heritability studies and gene association studies are no longer valid

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Straw Men, Weak Men, and Hollow Men.Scott F. Aikin & John Casey - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (1):87-105.
Tortuous dualism.Michael Levin - 1995 - Journal of Philosophy 92 (6):313-22.
The non-significance of straw man arguments.Niels G. Waller & Wesley O. Johnson - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):226-227.
Straw dogs: thoughts on humans and other animals.John Gray - 2003 - New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
In Hora Mortis. [REVIEW]Carole Straw - 1996 - Augustinian Studies 27 (2):181-186.
The Last Straw.Colin Boyd - 2004 - Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (3):581-592.
Augustine as Pastoral Theologian.Carole E. Straw - 1983 - Augustinian Studies 14:129-151.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
23 (#668,995)

6 months
1 (#1,506,218)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references