Straw Men, Weak Men, and Hollow Men

Argumentation 25 (1):87-105 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Three forms of the straw man fallacy are posed: the straw, weak, and hollow man. Additionally, there can be non-fallacious cases of any of these species of straw man arguments

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,635

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Nature, Human Identity, and Straw Men.Nathan Kowalsky - 2008 - Environmental Ethics 30 (4):443-444.
Real Men.Hugh LaFollette - 1992 - In Larry May & Robert Strikwerda (eds.), Masculinity. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 59--74.
Straw Men with Broken Legs: A Response to Per Sundstrom.P. Singer - 1995 - Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (2):89-90.
Do Don Juans Have Better Genes Than Family Men?Alice H. Eagly - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):601-602.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-11-17

Downloads
111 (#110,908)

6 months
6 (#124,445)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Scott Aikin
Vanderbilt University

References found in this work

Logic and Conversation.H. P. Grice - 1975 - In Donald Davidson & Gilbert Harman (eds.), The Logic of Grammar. Encino, CA: pp. 64-75.
A Practical Study of Argument.Trudy Govier - 1985 - Belmont, CA, USA: Wadsworth Pub. Co..
The Law of Group Polarization.Cass R. Sunstein - 2002 - Journal of Political Philosophy 10 (2):175–195.
A Concise Introduction to Logic.Patrick J. Hurley - 1982 - Belmont, CA, USA: Wadsworth.

View all 17 references / Add more references