The self-attribution bias and paranormal beliefs

Consciousness and Cognition 49:313-321 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/j.concog.2017.02.001

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,532

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Paranormal believers are more prone to illusory agency detection than skeptics.Michiel van Elk - 2013 - Consciousness and Cognition 22 (3):1041-1046.
Introducing the Modified Paranormal Belief Scale: Distinguishing Between Classic Paranormal Beliefs, Religious Paranormal Beliefs and Conventional Religiosity Among Undergraduates in Northern Ireland and Wales.Emyr Williams, Christopher Lewis & Leslie Francis - 2009 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion 31 (3):345-356.
Skeptical Saints and Critical Cognition: On the Relationship between Religion and Paranormal Beliefs.Douglas S. Krull & Eric S. McKibben - 2006 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion 28 (1):269-285.
Skeptical Saints and Critical Cognition: On the Relationship between Religion and Paranormal Beliefs.Douglas S. Krull & Eric S. McKibben - 2006 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion / Archiv für Religionspychologie 28 (1):269-285.
Believe It Or Not: Religious and Other Paranormal Beliefs in the United States.Tom W. Rice - 2003 - Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 42 (1):95-106.
Hostile Attribution Bias and Negative Reciprocity Beliefs Exacerbate Incivility’s Effects on Interpersonal Deviance.Long-Zeng Wu, Haina Zhang, Randy K. Chiu, Ho Kwong Kwan & Xiaogang He - 2014 - Journal of Business Ethics 120 (2):189-199.
Empirical Research and Paranormal Beliefs: Going Beyond the Epistemological Debate in Favour of the Individual.François P. Mathijsen - 2009 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion 31 (3):319-333.
The Effectiveness of Instruction in Scientific Reasoning in Altering Paranormal Beliefs in High School Students.Paul Revere Priest - 1995 - Dissertation, La Sierra University
Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief.Gordon Pennycook, James Allan Cheyne, Paul Seli, Derek J. Koehler & Jonathan A. Fugelsang - 2012 - Cognition 123 (3):335-346.
Understanding bias in scientific practice.Nancy E. Shaffer - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (3):97.
Implicit learning of sequential bias in a guessing task: Failure to demonstrate effects of dopamine administration and paranormal belief☆.John Palmer, Christine Mohr, Peter Krummenacher & Peter Brugger - 2007 - Consciousness and Cognition 16 (2):498-506.
Young People and Paranormal Experiences: Why Are They Scared? A Cognitive Pattern.François P. Mathijsen - 2010 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion 32 (3):345-361.
Animal beliefs and their contents.Frank Dreckmann - 1999 - Erkenntnis 51 (1):597-615.
Under influence.Frédérique De Vignemont & Hugo Mercier - unknown
ESP: extrasensory perception or effect of subjective probability?Peter Brugger & Kirsten I. Taylor - 2003 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 10 (6-7):6-7.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-03-11

Downloads
30 (#528,361)

6 months
5 (#626,991)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

A revised paranormal belief scale.Jerome J. Tobacyk - 2004 - International Journal of Transpersonal Studies 23 (23):94-98.
A life-span theory of control.Jutta Heckhausen & Richard Schulz - 1995 - Psychological Review 102 (2):284-304.

View all 8 references / Add more references