Charlie Hebdo attacks in the light of Aquinas’ Doctrine of double effect and ignatieff’s lesser evil theory

Human Affairs 26 (1):63-72 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to study and analyse the Charlie Hebdo attacks from a methodological and an ethical perspective, concentrating generally, though in some cases indirectly, on the consequences of our actions and the motives behind them. The analysis examines the issues of liberties, freedoms and responsibilities in general and further applies these values to the phenomenon of terrorism in contemporary society. The primary goal of this study is to use the Thomas Aquinas doctrine of double effect and Michael Ignatieff’s lesser evil theory to appraise specific acts of terrorism. The article suggests that certain freedoms should be limited in democratic societies and thus ensure safety.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-09-10

Downloads
14 (#991,618)

6 months
7 (#592,867)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

On two modern hybrid forms of consequentialism.Lukáš Švaňa - 2016 - Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 6 (3-4):157-166.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Just and Unjust Wars.M. Walzer - 1979 - Philosophy 54 (209):415-420.
"The Law of Peoples: With" The Idea of Public Reason Revisited,".John Rawls - 2002 - Philosophy East and West 52 (3):396-396.
Critical Notices.John Rawls - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (1):241-246.
The lesser evil: political ethics in an age of terror.Michael Ignatieff - 2004 - Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

View all 7 references / Add more references