Cognitive Science 36 (6):1078-1101 (2012)

A recent hypothesis in empirical brain research on language is that the fundamental difference between animal and human communication systems is captured by the distinction between finite-state and more complex phrase-structure grammars, such as context-free and context-sensitive grammars. However, the relevance of this distinction for the study of language as a neurobiological system has been questioned and it has been suggested that a more relevant and partly analogous distinction is that between non-adjacent and adjacent dependencies. Online memory resources are central to the processing of non-adjacent dependencies as information has to be maintained across intervening material. One proposal is that an external memory device in the form of a limited push-down stack is used to process non-adjacent dependencies. We tested this hypothesis in an artificial grammar learning paradigm where subjects acquired non-adjacent dependencies implicitly. Generally, we found no qualitative differences between the acquisition of non-adjacent dependencies and adjacent dependencies. This suggests that although the acquisition of non-adjacent dependencies requires more exposure to the acquisition material, it utilizes the same mechanisms used for acquiring adjacent dependencies. We challenge the push-down stack model further by testing its processing predictions for nested and crossed multiple non-adjacent dependencies. The push-down stack model is partly supported by the results, and we suggest that stack-like properties are some among many natural properties characterizing the underlying neurophysiological mechanisms that implement the online memory resources used in language and structured sequence processing
Keywords Nested  Non‐adjacent dependencies  Implicit learning  Artificial grammar learning  Crossed
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01235.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,316
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the N Tscheidungsproblem.Alan Turing - 1936 - Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 42 (1):230-265.
On Broca, Brain, and Binding: A New Framework.Peter Hagoort - 2005 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9 (9):416-423.

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Scope Control and Grammatical Dependencies.Alastair Butler - 2007 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16 (3):241-264.
Semantically Restricted Argument Dependencies.Alastair Butler - 2011 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 20 (1):69-114.
Affective Dependencies.Anastasia Giannakidou - 1999 - Linguistics and Philosophy 22 (4):367-421.
Locus Equation: Assumption and Dependencies.Richard E. Pastore & Edward J. Crawley - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):278-279.
Natural and Artificial Complexity.Robert C. Richardson - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (4):267.


Added to PP index

Total views
61 ( #188,968 of 2,519,511 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #407,153 of 2,519,511 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes