Diskussion/Discussion. Corporate Action: A Reply to Coleman

Analyse & Kritik 15 (2):216-218 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This short note argues that the basic points Coleman (1993) makes against my critical paper (1993) are incorrect. These points concern the possibility of a single agent holding a corporate goal, the doxastic conditions concerning group action, and 'jointness-effects'.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Corporate intention and corporate action.Raimo Tuomela - 1993 - Analyse & Kritik 15 (1):11-21.
Corporations, minors, and other innocents? A reply to R. E. Ewin.P. Eddy Wilson - 1994 - Journal of Business Ethics 13 (10):761 - 774.
Corporate Culpability and the Limits of Law.William S. Laufer - 1996 - Business Ethics Quarterly 6 (3):311-324.
The fiction of corporate scapegoating.P. Eddy Wilson - 1993 - Journal of Business Ethics 12 (10):779 - 784.
Corporate Responsibility Revisited.John Forge - 2002 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 16 (1):13-32.
Corporate character, corporate virtues.Geoff Moore - 2015 - Business Ethics: A European Review 24 (S2):99-114.
The freedom of collective agents.Frank Hindriks - 2007 - Journal of Political Philosophy 16 (2):165–183.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-27

Downloads
16 (#902,419)

6 months
3 (#962,988)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Raimo Tuomela
Last affiliation: University of Helsinki

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references