When Gestures Do or _Do Not_ Follow Language‐Specific Patterns of Motion Expression in Speech: Evidence from Chinese, English and Turkish

Cognitive Science 47 (4):e13261 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Speakers of different languages (e.g., English vs. Turkish) show a binary split in how they package and order components of a motion event in speech and co‐speech gesture but not in silent gesture. In this study, we focused on Mandarin Chinese, a language that does not follow the binary split in its expression of motion in speech, and asked whether adult Chinese speakers would follow the language‐specific speech patterns in co‐speech but not silent gesture, thus showing a pattern akin to Turkish and English adult speakers in their description of animated motion events. Our results provided evidence for this pattern, with Chinese—as well as English and Turkish—speakers following language‐specific patterns in speech and co‐speech gesture but not in silent gesture. Our results provide support for the “thinking‐for‐speaking” account, namely that language influences thought only during online, but not offline, production of speech.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,928

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Gesture projection and cosuppositions.Philippe Schlenker - 2018 - Linguistics and Philosophy 41 (3):295-365.
Hand, mouth and brain. The dynamic emergence of speech and gesture.J. Iverson & E. Thelen - 1999 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 6 (11-12):19-40.
Gesture profile of fluent and non-fluent people with aphasia.Gaëlle Ferré - 2022 - Corela. Cognition, Représentation, Langage 20.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-04-22

Downloads
13 (#1,036,918)

6 months
10 (#268,500)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?