The Problem of the Relationship between Ontology and Theory of Knowledge in the Works of Samara Philosophers of the Late Soviet Period

Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences 65 (2):33-66 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article discusses the issue of the relationship between ontology and theory of knowledge in the works of Samara philosophers of the late Soviet period. The purpose of the study is to identify the local specifics of Samara philosophical thought by revealing the system-forming significance of the problem of the conditional unity of being and thinking at the level of a distinctive separation between ontological premises and epistemological prospects of methodological reflection in scientific knowledge. The objectives of the article are (1) to establish the characteristic features of the views of Samara philosophers on the general methodological significance of the problem of the relationship between ontology and the theory of knowledge, (2) to demonstrate the methodological relevance of their theoretical principles in the context of the philosophy of science, (3) to substantiate the applicability of the latter for the activity approach to the social interpretation of theoretical results. In the course of the study, the author uses the method of distinctions, formed in onto-epistemology by M.A. Lifshitz, methods of functional analysis, diachronic reconstruction and rationing of the worldview legitimation of a particular subject theoretical entity. Thus, the article reveals the local specificity of the Samara philosophy of the era of developed socialism. The author analyzes the program for optimizing scientific knowledge based on the Borisov–Dukhanin methodology, tied to the materialistic solution of the “main question of philosophy” (i.e., the issue of the relationship of the being and consciousness). The article pays attention to the theory of the style of scientific thinking, proposed by V.T. Salosin, to the methodological foundations and reception of the socio-philosophical theory of M.S. Kvetnoy. The author examines the productivity of the Samara precedent of the interaction of worldview and methodological aspects in philosophy. The article concludes that the specificity of the Samara philosophers’ solution of the problem of the unity of being and thinking on the basis of the Marxist understanding of the the main question of philosophy lies in the fact that it is considered as a methodological problem of achieving logical consistency to express the balance between ontological premises and epistemological perspectives.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Knowledge of the external world.Bruce Aune - 1991 - New York: Routledge.
Veicoli semantici che sono opere d'arte.Tiziana Andina - 2012 - Aisthesis: Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 5.
What Happened to Epistemology In Our Tradititon?Henry Pietersma - 2006 - Review of Metaphysics 59 (3):553-576.
Kant and the problem of self-knowledge.Luca Forgione - 2018 - New York, Stati Uniti: Routledge.
Language and ontology.Kanti Lal Das & Anirban Mukherjee (eds.) - 2008 - New Delhi: Northern Book Centre.
Was Soviet Philosophy Marxist?G. D. Chesnokov - 2001 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 39 (4):80-83.
Philosophy of science in Estonia.Rein Vihalemm & Peeter Müürsepp - 2007 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 38 (1):167-191.
Logic and ontology.Thomas Hofweber - 2005 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-06

Downloads
7 (#1,382,898)

6 months
5 (#628,512)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references