Kantian Journal 38 (4):81-100 (2019)

Leonid Kornilaev
Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
The period between the late 1910s and early 1920s saw the emergence of onto-epistemological philosophical projects in Russia that was determined by criticism and attempts to overcome the domination of epistemology in philosophy which was the result of the intensive development of Neo-Kantianism and the influence of Husserl’s phenomenology. Attempts to turn towards ontology were made both by Russian religious philosophers and by Russian Neo-Kantians. I look at the little-studied philosophical projects of the Russian Neo-Kantians Lev Salagov and Nikolai Boldyrev. Their philosophical concepts share the tendency to transpose epistemological problems to ontology, and to identify and bring closer together epistemology and ontology. Russian philosophers ontologise the theory of cognition through the analysis of subjectivity, the complete elimination of psychological motives and the separation of transcendentalism from transcendentism. These principles enable Salagov to ground a three-part structure of cognition and to assert that the main task of genuine epistemology is exclusively the study of the cognitive relationship, committing to consciousness. They enable Boldyrev, proceeding from the separation of reflection and sensibility, to build a doctrine on the self-unfolding of being. Similar tendencies — a turn towards ontology — were observed in the same period in West European philosophy, including German Neo-Kantianism. However, the concepts of Russian Neo-Kantians, which imply a new orientation towards ontology, are fairly independent, and not only on account of the original interpretation of Kantian critical philosophy and Neo-Kantian epistemology, but also on account of internal discussion with the Russian philosophers belonging to other movements. The analysis of the onto-epistemological projects of Russian Neo-Kantians makes important additions to the picture of the reception of Neo-Kantianism in Russia.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5922/0207-6918-2019-4-4
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,683
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Critique of Pure Reason.I. Kant - 1787/1998 - Philosophy 59 (230):555-557.
Logik der Reinen Erkenntniss.Hermann Cohen - 1903 - The Monist 13:633.
The World as an Organic Whole.N. O. Lossky & Natalie A. Duddington - 1928 - Journal of Philosophical Studies 3 (12):530-532.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Hermann Cohen in the History of Russian Neo-Kantianism.N. Belov Vladimir - 2016 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 54 (5):395-407.
What Does (the Young) Heidegger Mean by the Seinsfrage?Carleton B. Christensen - 1999 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 42 (3-4):411 – 437.
Nikolai Lossky and Henri Bergson.Frédéric Tremblay - 2017 - Studies in East European Thought 69 (1):3-16.


Added to PP index

Total views
5 ( #1,183,238 of 2,462,378 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,313 of 2,462,378 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes