Attending Emotionally to Fiction

Journal of Value Inquiry 46 (4):449-465 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This paper addresses the so-called paradox of fiction, the problem of explaining how we can have emotional responses towards fiction. I claim that no account has yet provided an adequate explanation of how we can respond with genuine emotions when we know that the objects of our responses are fictional. I argue that we should understand the role played by the imagination in our engagement with fiction as functionally equivalent to that which it plays under the guise of acceptance in practical reasoning, suggesting that the same underlying cognitive-affective mechanisms are involved in both activities. As such, our imaginative engagement with fiction un-problematically arouses emotions, but only to the extent that we are not occurrently attending to our epistemic relation to the fiction i.e. fully attending to the fact that the object of our response is merely fictional. In order to illuminate this idea I examine a recent proposal that the phenomenology of attention is partially non-attributive, and I argue that emotional phenomenology too shares this characteristic

Similar books and articles

Really Believing in Fiction.David B. Suits - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (3):369–386.
All the Right Responses: Fiction Films and Warranted Emotions.Jinhee Choi - 2003 - British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (3):308-321.
Responding Emotionally to Fictions.Stephen Davies - 2009 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 67 (3):269 - 284.
Truth and Reference in Fiction.Stavroula Glezakos - 2012 - In Gillian Russell & Delia Graff Fara (eds.), Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Routledge.
The Dangers of da Vinci, or the Power of Popular Fiction.Sarah E. Worth - 2007 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 14 (1):134-143.
Fiction's Ontological Commitments.Christopher Mole - 2009 - Philosophical Forum 40 (4):473-488.
Emotions, Fiction, and Cognitive Architecture.Aaron Meskin & Jonathan M. Weinberg - 2003 - British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (1):18-34.
Images of Corporate Executives in Recent Fiction.Bernard Sarachek - 1995 - Journal of Business Ethics 14 (3):195 - 205.
Attending and Glancing.Edward S. Casey - 2004 - Continental Philosophy Review 37 (1):83-126.
The Tale and the Teller.R. A. Sharpe - 2002 - British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (4):415-418.


Added to PP

171 (#73,065)

6 months
27 (#40,984)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Is the Paradox of Fiction Soluble in Psychology?Florian Cova & Fabrice Teroni - 2016 - Philosophical Psychology 29 (6):930-942.
Emotion, Fiction and Rationality.Fabrice Teroni - 2019 - British Journal of Aesthetics 59 (2):113-128.
Emotion and Value.Cain Todd - 2014 - Philosophy Compass 9 (10):702-712.
Moved by Music Alone.Tom Cochrane - 2021 - British Journal of Aesthetics 61 (4):455-470.
Le paradoxe de la fiction: le retour.Florian Cova & Fabrice Teroni - 2015 - L'expression des Émotions: Mélanges En l'Honneur de Patrizia Lombardo.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Attention and Mental Paint1.Ned Block - 2010 - Philosophical Issues 20 (1):23-63.
Attention as Structuring of the Stream of Consciousness.Sebastian Watzl - 2011 - In Christopher Mole, Declan Smithies & Wayne Wu (eds.), Attention: Philosophical and Psychological Essays. Oxford University Press. pp. 145.
The Moral Psychology of Fiction.Gregory Currie - 1995 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73 (2):250 – 259.
Imaginative Resistance Revisited.Tamar Szabo Gendler - 2006 - In Shaun Nichols (ed.), The Architecture of the Imagination. Oxford University Press. pp. 149-173.

View all 7 references / Add more references