Features of political interaction of interest groups in the intra-party communication processes

Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 5:117-125 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The study communication processes within modern political parties is impossible without establishing the basic principles of the party. Throughout the history of political parties of their organizational structure has undergone great changes. In modern developed democratic countries, political party structure consists of a number of different interest groups and pressure. Despite the common association ideological, social and political objectives and interests of these groups within the political parties are trying to fiht and compete for leadership in the policy-making process. The most important internal feature of modern political parties is forming the system of coordination of interests within the party. First of all this is achieved by creating a system of communication interaction interest groups, the party elite and counter-elite. The relationship between these elements of the party depends largely on the existing system of party discipline, party ethics and the existing hierarchical system of interaction between the party leadership and «ordinary» members of the party, between central hierarchical structures of the party and the local, between party members included in the various parliamentary and governmental and nonparliamentary groups within the party and so on. Ensure optimal form of inner communication is the formation of interest groups Institute of party democracy. In most developed countries, certain elements of party democracy established by law. Similar rules exist in the legislation of Germany, Italy, Spain, Greece, Albania, Andorra, Armenia, France, Romania, Czech Republic and Portugal. Internal party democracy is not threatened by party discipline and intervention of public authorities in the hierarchical and organizational features of inner communication. A clear manifestation of internal party democratization process of interaction is the introduction of «primaries». This allows you to adjust the relationship between interest groups within political parties without increased competition for leadership and possible negative consequences.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Processes of internal and external political communication in modern political parties: the main conceptual positions.M. Timchenko - 2015 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 4:107-114.
The concept of the cartel of political parties and party system of Ukraine.V. Kremena - 2015 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 4:249-254.
Party process in italy: state of scientifi problems.M. Svetlakova - 2015 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 2:201-209.
Ukraine’s party system and traditional typology of political parties.V. Kremena - 2015 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 3:98-104.
Formation of the Ukrainian political nation in the context of ensuring national security of the Ukrainian state.L. Chupriy - 2012 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 3 (22):240-245.
The Evolvement of Modern Party Politics in Egypt.Quan-an Ha - 2007 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 4:133-140.
The specifics and peculiarities of the interaction of the informational-political space and the political culture of Ukraine.A. Rudneva - 2012 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 3 (22):151-157.
Taiwan's Party Primaries in Comparative Perspective.Chung-li Wu & Dafydd Fell - 2001 - Japanese Journal of Political Science 2 (1):23-45.
Twentieth-Century British Christian Democratic Movements: The Search for a Political Space.Paolo Morisi - 2013 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2013 (163):61-84.
Party-civil interaction in the context of the contemporary political communication.L. Ryzenkova - 2013 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 4 (23):70-74.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-11-28

Downloads
1 (#1,901,511)

6 months
1 (#1,471,540)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Мета людської діяльності як елемент соціального буття.Павлова Тетяна - 2017 - Вісник Черкаського Університету. Серія Філософія 2:87--92.

Add more references