What Matters in Survival: Self-determination and The Continuity of Life Trajectories

Acta Analytica 39 (1):37-56 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I argue that standard psychological continuity theory does not account for an important feature of what is important in survival – having the property of personhood. I offer a theory that can account for this, and I explain how it avoids the implausible consequences of standard psychological continuity theory, as well as having certain other advantages over that theory.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-23

Downloads
4,566 (#1,312)

6 months
1,022 (#1,008)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Heidi Erika Brock
University of Maryland, College Park (PhD)

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Counterfactuals.David K. Lewis - 1973 - Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
Philosophical explanations.Robert Nozick - 1981 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
The View From Nowhere.Thomas Nagel - 1986 - New York: Oxford University Press.
A treatise of human nature.David Hume & A. D. Lindsay - 1969 - Harmondsworth,: Penguin Books. Edited by Ernest Campbell Mossner.

View all 100 references / Add more references