Holy Argument: Some Reflections on the Jewish Piety of Argument, Process Theology and the Philosophy of Religion: N. L. TIDWELL

Religious Studies 32 (4):477-488 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Argument is the very life-blood of philosophy and, hence, prima facie one might expect that distinctive phenomenon of the Jewish religious tradition, ‘holy argument’, to be of special interest to philosophers, particularly philosophers of religion. However, there is little to suggest that those engaged in the philosophical approach to religion are even aware that such a phenomenon as a piety of argument exists. But it does. In the philosophical field rational argument conducted according to the established rules of logic is the fundamental tool in the pursuit of truth and understanding or for the clarification of problems, ideas and concepts; in Judaism, rational, legal argument pursued according to recognized principles and processes is the most highly commended path to encounter and engagement with God. Moreover, within this same religious tradition, ‘holy argument’ embraces not only argument about God, about His nature, His ways and His will, but also argument with God, putting God on trial and taking Him to task as One who is Himself bound and judged by that same Torah that Israel is obligated to obey. The high value placed upon study and the exercise of the intellect in the Jewish tradition is well known; it is not only a mitzvah and an act of worship but a form of imitatio Dei, for God Himself engages in the study of Torah. But the mode of study in Judaism and the form in which the intellect is exercised is characteristically that of argument and debate, the quintessential activity of philosophy and philosophers.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ocr Philosophy of Religion for as and A.Matthew Taylor - 2007 - New York: Routledge. Edited by Jon Mayled & Matthew Taylor.
Toward a new kalām cosmological argument.Benjamin Victor Waters - 2015 - Cogent Arts and Humanities 2 (1).
Paley’s Argument for Design.Graham Oppy - 2002 - Philo 5 (2):161-173.
The Links between Religion and Intolerance.Yossi Nehushtan - 2011 - Philosophy and Theology 23 (1):91-132.
Rowe's Probabilistic Argument from Evil.Richard Otte - 2002 - Faith and Philosophy 19 (2):147-171.
Burhani Siddiqin in Imam Khomeini.Abbas Sadi - unknown - Kheradnameh Sadra Quarterly 34.
The Argument from Desire.Robert Holyer - 1988 - Faith and Philosophy 5 (1):61-71.
The vanishing argument from queerness.Lee Shepski - 2008 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (3):371 – 387.
A Careful Reading of St. Anselm’s Ontological Argument.Clint I. Barrett - 2011 - Philosophy and Theology 23 (2):217-230.
Plato's Euthyphro 10 a to 11 b.Thomas D. Paxson - 1972 - Phronesis 17 (2):171 - 190.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
69 (#236,017)

6 months
1 (#1,464,097)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references