The Argument from Desire

Faith and Philosophy 5 (1):61-71 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this essay I offer a reformulation and defense of the argument from desire as it is presented in the works of C. S. Lewis. Specifically, I try to answer the criticisms of the argument made by John Beversluis in his recent book C. S. Lewis and the Search for Rational Religion. However, my concern is not so much Lewis as it is the argument itself, which I argue is worthy of serious and more extended philosophical treatment.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A defense of local miracle compatibilism.Peter A. Graham - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 140 (1):65 - 82.
Naturalness and arbitrariness.Theodore Sider - 1996 - Philosophical Studies 81 (2-3):283 - 301.
A Natural Response to Boonin.Andrew J. Peach - 2005 - International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (3):357-376.
Lehrer and the consequence argument.Danilo Šuster - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 161 (1):77-86.
Mechanism: A rejoinder.John R. Lucas - 1970 - Philosophy 45 (April):149-51.
Lewis on fallible knowledge.Igor Douven - 2005 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (4):573 – 580.
Dilemmas and Moral Realism.Nick Zangwill - 1999 - Utilitas 11 (1):71.
Argument to Love.Viktor Tchouechov - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 49:121-127.
Philosophy and Desire.Hugh J. Silverman (ed.) - 2000 - New York: Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
82 (#204,610)

6 months
6 (#520,848)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?