Foucault, fields of governability, and the population–family–economy nexus in china

History and Theory 51 (1):42-62 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACTIt was only in the early twentieth century that China discovered that it had a population, at least if a population is understood not as a simple number of people but instead in terms of such features as variable levels of health, birth and death rates, age, sex, dependency ratios, and so on—as an object with a distinct rationality and intrinsic dynamics that can be made the target of a specific kind of direct intervention. In 1900, such a developmentalist conception of the population simply did not exist in China; by the 1930s, it pervaded the entire social and political field from top to bottom. Through a reading of a series of foundational texts in population and family reformism in China, this paper argues that this birth of the Chinese population occurred as a result of a general transformation of practices of governing, one that necessarily also involved a reconceptualization of the family and a new logic of overall social rationalization; in short, the isolation of a population–family–economy nexus as a central field of modern governing. This process is captured by elaborating and extending Foucault's studies of the historical emergence of apparatuses into a notion of fields of governability. Finally, this paper argues that the one‐child policy, launched in the late 1970s, should be understood not in isolation from the imposition of the “family‐responsibility system” in agriculture and market reforms in exactly that period, but as part—mutatis mutandis—of a return to a form of governing that was developed in the first half of the twentieth century

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Foucault, the Modern Mother, and Maternal Power: Notes Toward a Genealogy of the Mother.Katherine Logan - 2012 - In Robbie Duschinsky & Leon Antonio Rocha (eds.), Foucault, the family and politics. New York, NY: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Political implications of confucian familism.Antonio Rappa & Sor-Hoon Tan - 2003 - Asian Philosophy 13 (2 & 3):87 – 102.
Foucault.José Guilherme Merquior - 1985 - Berkeley: University of California Press.
Ideology and Today’s China.He Ping - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:623-630.
Toward a Confucian Family-Oriented Health Care System for the Future of China.Y. Cao, X. Chen & R. Fan - 2011 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (5):452-465.
Foucault and Familial Power.Chloë Taylor - 2012 - Hypatia 27 (1):201-218.
On the phenomenon of “return to marx” in china.Ping He - 2007 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (2):219-229.
Michel Foucault: critical assessments.Barry Smart (ed.) - 1988 - New York: Routledge.
Theories of family in ancient chinese philosophy.Zailin Zhang - 2009 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (3):343-359.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-30

Downloads
22 (#706,230)

6 months
3 (#965,065)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references