- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Inconsistency measures for probabilistic logics
Artificial Intelligence 197 (C):1-24 (2013)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Measuring inconsistency in information.John Grant & Maria Vanina Martinez (eds.) - 2018 - [London]: College Publications.
Relative inconsistency measures.Philippe Besnard & John Grant - 2020 - Artificial Intelligence 280 (C):103231.
On the expressivity of inconsistency measures.Matthias Thimm - 2016 - Artificial Intelligence 234 (C):120-151.
Weak nonmonotonic probabilistic logics.Thomas Lukasiewicz - 2005 - Artificial Intelligence 168 (1-2):119-161.
Expressive probabilistic description logics.Thomas Lukasiewicz - 2008 - Artificial Intelligence 172 (6-7):852-883.
Handling and measuring inconsistency in non-monotonic logics.Markus Ulbricht, Matthias Thimm & Gerhard Brewka - 2020 - Artificial Intelligence 286 (C):103344.
Measuring inconsistency in probabilistic logic: rationality postulates and Dutch book interpretation.Glauber De Bona & Marcelo Finger - 2015 - Artificial Intelligence 227 (C):140-164.
Inconsistency management for traffic regulations: formalization and complexity results.Harald Beck, Thomas Eiter & Thomas Krennwallner - 2012 - In Luis Farinas del Cerro, Andreas Herzig & Jerome Mengin (eds.), Logics in Artificial Intelligence. Springer. pp. 80--93.
Diverse confidence levels in a probabilistic semantics for conditional logics.Paul Snow - 1999 - Artificial Intelligence 113 (1-2):269-279.
An AGM-style belief revision mechanism for probabilistic spatio-temporal logics.John Grant, Francesco Parisi, Austin Parker & V. S. Subrahmanian - 2010 - Artificial Intelligence 174 (1):72-104.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-12-22
Downloads
8 (#1,334,194)
6 months
4 (#1,005,419)
2020-12-22
Downloads
8 (#1,334,194)
6 months
4 (#1,005,419)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Measuring inconsistency in probabilistic logic: rationality postulates and Dutch book interpretation.Glauber De Bona & Marcelo Finger - 2015 - Artificial Intelligence 227 (C):140-164.
On the complexity of inconsistency measurement.Matthias Thimm & Johannes P. Wallner - 2019 - Artificial Intelligence 275 (C):411-456.
Handling and measuring inconsistency in non-monotonic logics.Markus Ulbricht, Matthias Thimm & Gerhard Brewka - 2020 - Artificial Intelligence 286 (C):103344.
On the expressivity of inconsistency measures.Matthias Thimm - 2016 - Artificial Intelligence 234 (C):120-151.
Measuring inconsistency in some branching time logics.John Grant - 2021 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 31 (2):85-107.
References found in this work
Audiences in argumentation frameworks.Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Sylvie Doutre & Paul E. Dunne - 2007 - Artificial Intelligence 171 (1):42-71.
Anytime deduction for probabilistic logic.Alan M. Frisch & Peter Haddawy - 1994 - Artificial Intelligence 69 (1-2):93-122.
On the measure of conflicts: Shapley Inconsistency Values.Anthony Hunter & Sébastien Konieczny - 2010 - Artificial Intelligence 174 (14):1007-1026.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-xdvnm uwo