- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
On the measure of conflicts: Shapley Inconsistency Values
Artificial Intelligence 174 (14):1007-1026 (2010)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: More accurate approximations to Shapley values.Kjersti Aas, Martin Jullum & Anders Løland - 2021 - Artificial Intelligence 298 (C):103502.
Coalitional permutation manipulations in the Gale-Shapley algorithm.Weiran Shen, Yuan Deng & Pingzhong Tang - 2021 - Artificial Intelligence 301 (C):103577.
A linear approximation method for the Shapley value.Shaheen S. Fatima, Michael Wooldridge & Nicholas R. Jennings - 2008 - Artificial Intelligence 172 (14):1673-1699.
Coalitional games induced by matching problems: Complexity and islands of tractability for the Shapley value.Gianluigi Greco, Francesco Lupia & Francesco Scarcello - 2020 - Artificial Intelligence 278 (C):103180.
On the measure of conflicts: an argumentation-based framework.Badran Raddaoui - 2018 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 28 (2-3):240-259.
A correction to “Nonmonotonic inconsistency” [Artificial Intelligence 149 (2003) 161–178].Charles B. Cross - 2004 - Artificial Intelligence 160 (1-2):191-192.
Strong inconsistency.Gerhard Brewka, Matthias Thimm & Markus Ulbricht - 2019 - Artificial Intelligence 267 (C):78-117.
Relative inconsistency measures.Philippe Besnard & John Grant - 2020 - Artificial Intelligence 280 (C):103231.
On the complexity of inconsistency measurement.Matthias Thimm & Johannes P. Wallner - 2019 - Artificial Intelligence 275 (C):411-456.
On the expressivity of inconsistency measures.Matthias Thimm - 2016 - Artificial Intelligence 234 (C):120-151.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-12-22
Downloads
7 (#1,412,480)
6 months
6 (#587,779)
2020-12-22
Downloads
7 (#1,412,480)
6 months
6 (#587,779)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Measuring inconsistency in probabilistic logic: rationality postulates and Dutch book interpretation.Glauber De Bona & Marcelo Finger - 2015 - Artificial Intelligence 227 (C):140-164.
Inconsistency measures for probabilistic logics.Matthias Thimm - 2013 - Artificial Intelligence 197 (C):1-24.
On the complexity of inconsistency measurement.Matthias Thimm & Johannes P. Wallner - 2019 - Artificial Intelligence 275 (C):411-456.
Handling and measuring inconsistency in non-monotonic logics.Markus Ulbricht, Matthias Thimm & Gerhard Brewka - 2020 - Artificial Intelligence 286 (C):103344.
On the expressivity of inconsistency measures.Matthias Thimm - 2016 - Artificial Intelligence 234 (C):120-151.
References found in this work
On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions.Carlos E. Alchourrón, Peter Gärdenfors & David Makinson - 1985 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 50 (2):510-530.
What does a conditional knowledge base entail?Daniel Lehmann & Menachem Magidor - 1992 - Artificial Intelligence 55 (1):1-60.
On the logic of iterated belief revision.Adnan Darwiche & Judea Pearl - 1997 - Artificial Intelligence 89 (1-2):1-29.
A theory of diagnosis from first principles.Raymond Reiter - 1987 - Artificial Intelligence 32 (1):57-95.
On Inferences from Inconsistent Premises.Nicholas Rescher & Ruth Manor - 1970 - Theory and Decision 1 (2):179-217, 1970-1971.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-x7cz5 uwo