Audiences in argumentation frameworks

, &
Artificial Intelligence 171 (1):42-71 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/j.artint.2006.10.013

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Imagine the Audience – On Audience Research in Rhetoric, Argumentation, and Christopher Tindale’s The Philosophy of Argumentation and Audience Reception.E. Kjeldsen Jens - unknown
Try to see it my way: Modelling persuasion in legal discourse. [REVIEW]Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (4):271-287.
Abduction in argumentation frameworks.Chiaki Sakama - 2018 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 28 (2-3):218-239.
Agreeing to Differ: Modelling Persuasive Dialogue Between Parties With Different Values.Chris Reed - 2002 - Informal Logic 22 (3).
Argumentation in AI and law: Editors' introduction. [REVIEW]Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon & Paul E. Dunne - 2005 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (1):1-8.
Senses of ‘argument’ in instantiated argumentation frameworks.Adam Wyner, Trevor Bench-Capon, Paul Dunne & Federico Cerutti - 2015 - Argument and Computation 6 (1):50-72.
Studying Rhetorical Audiences – a Call for Qualitative Reception Studies in Argumentation and Rhetoric.Jens Elmelund Kjeldsen - 2016 - Informal Logic 36 (2):136-158.
A Generalized Proof-Theoretic Approach to Logical Argumentation Based on Hypersequents.AnneMarie Borg, Christian Straßer & Ofer Arieli - 2020 - Studia Logica 109 (1):167-238.
Studying Rhetorical Audiences.E. Kjeldsen Jens - unknown
Formalizing value-guided argumentation for ethical systems design.Bart Verheij - 2016 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 24 (4):387-407.
Collective argumentation: A survey of aggregation issues around argumentation frameworks.Gustavo Bodanza, Fernando Tohmé & Marcelo Auday - 2017 - Argument and Computation 8 (1):1-34.
Relating Carneades with abstract argumentation via the ASPIC+ framework for structured argumentation.Bas van Gijzel & Henry Prakken - 2012 - Argument and Computation 3 (1):21 - 47.
Preservation of semantic properties in collective argumentation: The case of aggregating abstract argumentation frameworks.Weiwei Chen & Ulle Endriss - 2019 - Artificial Intelligence 269 (C):27-48.
Meta-Argumentation Modelling I: Methodology and Techniques.G. Boella, D. M. Gabbay, L. van der Torre & S. Villata - 2009 - Studia Logica 93 (2-3):297-354.
Meta-argumentation modelling I: Methodology and techniques.Dov Guido Boella, Leendert der Torre M. Gabbavany & Serena Villata - forthcoming - Studia Logica.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-22

Downloads
10 (#1,160,791)

6 months
6 (#522,885)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

A general account of argumentation with preferences.Sanjay Modgil & Henry Prakken - 2013 - Artificial Intelligence 195 (C):361-397.
Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks.Sanjay Modgil - 2009 - Artificial Intelligence 173 (9-10):901-934.

View all 46 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

A logic for default reasoning.Ray Reiter - 1980 - Artificial Intelligence 13 (1-2):81-137.
Defeasible Reasoning.John L. Pollock - 1987 - Cognitive Science 11 (4):481-518.
Semantic Considerations on nonmonotonic Logic.Robert C. Moore - 1985 - Artificial Intelligence 25 (1):75-94.

View all 52 references / Add more references