- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Critical Study: Nancy Cartwright's The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science
Noûs 36 (4):699-725 (2002)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Nancy Cartwright, the dappled world. A study of the boundaries of science.Daniela M. Bailer-Jones - 2001 - Erkenntnis 54 (3):412-415.
Book review: introduction and reply to - the dappled world: a study of the boundaries of science. [REVIEW]Nancy Cartwright - 2002 - Philosophical Books 43 (4):241-278.
Cartwright, Nancy. The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. [REVIEW]Eric D. Hetherington - 2000 - Review of Metaphysics 54 (2):424-426.
The dappled world: A study of the boundaries of science by Nancy Cartwright cambridge university press, 1999, £35.00, £12.95. [REVIEW]Stephen Mumfordt - 2000 - Philosophy 75 (4):613-626.
The dappled world: A study of the boundaries of science, Nancy Cartwright. Cambridge university press, 1999, IX + 240 pages. [REVIEW]Harold Kincaid - 2003 - Economics and Philosophy 19 (1):167-170.
Dancy Cartwright: Particularism in the philosophy of science. [REVIEW]Constantine Sandis - 2006 - Acta Analytica 21 (2):30-40.
Is the World Really “Dappled”? A Response to Cartwright’s Charge against “Cross‐Wise Reduction”.Stéphanie Ruphy - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (1):57-67.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-11-22
Downloads
76 (#217,217)
6 months
12 (#209,539)
2013-11-22
Downloads
76 (#217,217)
6 months
12 (#209,539)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The future, and what might have been.R. A. Briggs & Graeme A. Forbes - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (2):505-532.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-wg6s5 uwo