On the Intrinsic Value of Genetic Integrity

Ethics, Policy and Environment 18 (3):248-251 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In their article Yasha Rohwer and Emma Marris argue that there is no underived prima facie obligation to preserve genetic integrity. It is clearly demonstrated that conservation bi...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the Intrinsic Value of Genetic Integrity: A Commentary.Attila Tanyi - 2015 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 18 (3):248-251.
Genetic Integrity and the Very Idea of a Prima Facie Duty.Kevin Meeker - 2015 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 18 (3):256-258.
Nature’s Legacy: On Rohwer and Marris and Genomic Conservation.Richard Christian - 2015 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 18 (3):265-267.
‘Attack of the Hybrid Swarm?’.Jennifer Welchman - 2015 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 18 (3):252-255.
Genetic Integrity, Authenticity, and Aesthetic Worth.Shlomo Cohen - 2015 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 18 (3):271-274.
Erratum.[author unknown] - 2016 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 19 (1):118-118.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-13

Downloads
39 (#398,051)

6 months
10 (#384,931)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Is CRISPR an Ethical Game Changer?Marcus Schultz-Bergin - 2018 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 31 (2):219-238.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Reasons and Persons.Joseph Margolis - 1986 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (2):311-327.

Add more references