Respect, Protection and Restoration: Preservation as a Negative or a Positive Duty

Ethics, Policy and Environment 18 (3):268-270 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Yasha Rohwer and Emma Marris argue that we do not have a prima facie duty to preserve the genetic integrity of species. Rohwer and Marris take the duty to preserve genetic integrity as being equal...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Nature’s Legacy: On Rohwer and Marris and Genomic Conservation.Richard Christian - 2015 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 18 (3):265-267.
On the Intrinsic Value of Genetic Integrity.Attila Tanyi - 2015 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 18 (3):248-251.
Genetic Integrity and the Very Idea of a Prima Facie Duty.Kevin Meeker - 2015 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 18 (3):256-258.
‘Attack of the Hybrid Swarm?’.Jennifer Welchman - 2015 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 18 (3):252-255.
On the Intrinsic Value of Genetic Integrity: A Commentary.Attila Tanyi - 2015 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 18 (3):248-251.
Genetic Integrity, Authenticity, and Aesthetic Worth.Shlomo Cohen - 2015 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 18 (3):271-274.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-13

Downloads
5 (#847,061)

6 months
38 (#406,104)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Respect.Robin S. Dillon - 2018 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references