On Professor Westman's Reply to Copernicus and Astrology, with an Appendix of Translations of Additional Primary Sources

Perspectives on Science 21 (3):384-385 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Professor Westman’s reply need be considered only briefly. When I received for review The Copernican Question, Prognostication, Skepticism, and Celestial Order, with its superlative commendations, I believed I had in my hands a book of surpassing erudition, the culmination of more than forty years of study by one of the world’s greatest experts on Copernicus and the astronomy and astrology of the Renaissance and early modern period. Imagine my surprise as I read this vast tome and discovered that it did not appear worthy of Professor Westman’s eminence. Still, I reviewed the book as well as I could and, leaving aside matters of opinion, concentrated upon two issues, competence and trust. Is Professor Westman ..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to Westman.J. L. Heilbron - 2013 - Perspectives on Science 21 (3):386-386.
Copernicus, the orbs, and the equant.Peter Barker - 1990 - Synthese 83 (2):317 - 323.
Professor Housman on Greek Astrology.V. V. Ramana-Ŝāstrin - 1922 - The Classical Review 36 (1-2):20-21.
Robert Westman on Galileo and Related Matters.J. L. Heilbron - 2012 - Perspectives on Science 20 (3):379-388.
Reply to Professor Brender and Professor Byrne.Phillip Cole - 2002 - Social Philosophy Today 18:197-206.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-08-22

Downloads
55 (#289,423)

6 months
9 (#302,300)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Neal Swerdlow
University of California, San Diego

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references