The First Amendment and Physician Speech in Reproductive Decision Making

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43 (1):22-34 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Courts are divided as to whether abortion informed consent mandates violate the First Amendment. This article argues that given the doctor's and patient's unique expertise, the patient's strong interests in autonomous decision making, and the fact that these laws regulate speech, rather than conduct, heighted or strict scrutiny should apply to such mandates

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/jlme.12193

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Abortion and Compelled Physician Speech.David Orentlicher - 2015 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43 (1):9-21.
Shared decision-making, gender and new technologies.Kristin Zeiler - 2007 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 10 (3):279-287.
Medical decision making: a physician's guide.Alan Schwartz - 2008 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by George Bergus.
Making Health Care Decisions: A Report on the Ethical and Legal Implications of Informed Consent in the Patient—Practitioner Relationship.United States - 1982 - President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research for Sale by the Supt. Of Docs., U.S. G.P.O.
Physician-patient relations: No more models.Greg Clarke, Robert T. Hall & Greg Rosencrance - 2004 - American Journal of Bioethics 4 (2):16 – 19.
Physician-patient decision-making: a study in medical ethics.Douglas N. Walton - 1985 - Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.
Decision making in health care: theory, psychology, and applications.Gretchen B. Chapman & Frank A. Sonnenberg (eds.) - 2000 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Informed consent: a primer for clinical practice.Deborah Bowman - 2012 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by John Spicer & Rehana Iqbal.
Free speech as risk analysis: Heuristics, biases, and institutions in the first amendment.Paul Horwitz - manuscript
Informed consent in the Pakistani milieu: the physician's perspective.A. M. Jafarey - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (2):93-96.
Nonsense and the Freedom of Speech: What Meaning Means for the First Amendment.Joseph Blocher - unknown
Medical decision-making and communication of risks: an ethical perspective.C. Breitsameter - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (6):349-352.
Legal briefing: Shared decision making and patient decision aids.T. M. Pope & M. Hexum - 2013 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 24 (1):70-80.
The Family's Role in Medical Decision-making from the Point of View of a Physician in the United States.Sumiko Takanami - 2002 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 12 (6):216-219.
Informed Decision Making and Abortion: Crisis Pregnancy Centers, Informed Consent, and the First Amendment.Aziza Ahmed - 2015 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43 (1):51-58.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-07

Downloads
16 (#906,902)

6 months
3 (#976,478)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Reproductive Technologies and Free Speech.Sonia M. Suter - 2021 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 49 (4):514-530.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Silent World of Doctor and Patient.Daniel Callahan & Jay Katz - 1984 - Hastings Center Report 14 (6):47.
The 'Right' Not to know.D. E. Ost - 1984 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 9 (3):301-312.

View all 9 references / Add more references