Greenwood Press (1985)
AbstractWalton offers a comprehensive, flexible model for physician-patient decision making, the first such tool designed to be applied at the level of each particular case. Based on Aristotelian practical reasoning, it develops a method of reasonable dialogue, a question- and-answer process of interaction leading to informed consent on the part of the patient, and to a decision--mutually arrived at--reflecting both high medical standards and the patient's felt needs. After setting forth his model, he applies it to three vital ethical issues: acts of omission, the cessation of treatment, and possible side effects of treatments. In the final chapter, Walton shows how his method functions in light of the real-life complexities of the clinical encounter and how it bears on ethical questions concerning health-care policy, attitudes toward treatment and toward the medical profession, reasonableness of expectations, and the setting of realistic goals of treatment.
Similar books and articles
Physician-Patient Decision-Making: A Study in Medical Ethics Douglas N. Walton Contributions in Philosophy, vol. 27 New York, NY: Greenwood Press, 1985. xv, 265 p. $35.00. [REVIEW]Georges Hélal - 1988 - Dialogue 27 (1):163.
Medical Choices, Medical Chances: How Patients, Families, and Physicians Can Cope with Uncertainty.Harold Bursztajn (ed.) - 1981 - Routledge.
Decision Making in Health Care: Theory, Psychology, and Applications.Gretchen B. Chapman & Frank A. Sonnenberg (eds.) - 2000 - Cambridge University Press.
Physician-patient relations: No more models.Greg Clarke, Robert T. Hall & Greg Rosencrance - 2004 - American Journal of Bioethics 4 (2):16 – 19.
For the Patient's Good: The Restoration of Beneficence in Health Care.Edmund D. Pellegrino - 1988 - Oxford University Press.
Reflections on a medical ethics for the future.Andre Vries - 1982 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 3 (1):115-120.
Resolving Ethical Dilemmas: A Guide for Clinicians.Bernard Lo - 1994 - Philadelphia: Williams & Wilkins.
Informed Consent: A Primer for Clinical Practice.Deborah Bowman - 2011 - Cambridge University Press.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Citations of this work
“Let Me Tell You Why!”. When Argumentation in Doctor–Patient Interaction Makes a Difference.Sara Rubinelli & Peter J. Schulz - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (3):353-375.
Arguing 'for' the Patient: Informed Consent and Strategic Maneuvering in Doctor–Patient Interaction. [REVIEW]Peter J. Schulz & Sara Rubinelli - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (3):423-432.
Introduction to the Special Issue.Fabrizio Macagno & Alice Toniolo - 2022 - Informal Logic 42 (4):1-23.
Erratum to: Arguing ‘for’ the Patient: Informed Consent and Strategic Maneuvering in Doctor–Patient Interaction.Peter J. Schulz & Sara Rubinelli - 2015 - Argumentation 29 (4):481-491.
Introduction: Evidence, Expertise and Argumentation in Evidence-Based Medicine.Fabrizio Macagno & Carlo Martini - 2021 - Topoi 40 (2):295-298.
References found in this work
No references found.