The problem with the farmer’s voice

&
Agriculture and Human Values 31 (4):649-653 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this essay we present three biases that make it difficult to represent farmer voices in a meaningful way. These biases are information bias, individual bias, and short-term bias. We illustrate these biases through two case studies. One is the case of Golden Rice in the Philippines and the other is the case of Bt cotton in India

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s10460-014-9535-1

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Case studies on smallholder farmer voice: an introduction to a special symposium.Harvey S. James & Iddisah Sulemana - 2014 - Agriculture and Human Values 31 (4):637-641.
Emotions and the Problem of Other Minds.Hanna Pickard - 2003 - In A. Hatimoysis (ed.), Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement. pp. 87-103.
Partner to the Poor: A Paul Farmer Reader by Paul Farmer: Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2010. [REVIEW]Anthony Tirado Chase - 2011 - Human Rights Review 12 (4):545-547.
Presuppositions for proportional quantifiers.Chris Barker - 1996 - Natural Language Semantics 4 (3):237-259.
What does "build research on farmer practice" mean? Rice crop establishment (beusani) in eastern India as an illustration.Sam Fujisaka - 1991 - Agriculture and Human Values 8 (1-2):93-98.
Reported voice difficulties in student teachers: A questionnaire survey.Carol Fairfield & Brian Richards - 2007 - British Journal of Educational Studies 55 (4):409-425.
Reconstructing the good farmer identity: shifts in farmer identities and farm management practices to improve water quality. [REVIEW]Jean McGuire, Lois Wright Morton & Alicia D. Cast - 2013 - Agriculture and Human Values 30 (1):57-69.
Participation, empowerment, and farmer evaluations: A comparative analysis of IPM technology generation in Nicaragua. [REVIEW]Kristen C. Nelson - 1994 - Agriculture and Human Values 11 (2-3):109-125.
A unification-theoretic method for investigating the k-provability problem.William M. Farmer - 1991 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 51 (3):173-214.
When Employees Stop Talking and Start Fighting: The Detrimental Effects of Pseudo Voice in Organizations. [REVIEW]Gerdien Vries, Karen A. Jehn & Bart W. Terwel - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 105 (2):221-230.
“Organizational Terrorism” and Moral Choices – Exercising Voice When the Leader is the Problem.Mayra Canuto-Carranco - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 97 (1):159 - 171.
When Employees Stop Talking and Start Fighting: The Detrimental Effects of Pseudo Voice in Organizations.Gerdien de Vries, Karen A. Jehn & Bart W. Terwel - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 105 (2):221-230.
Autonomy and credibility: Voice as method.Ira J. Cohen & Mary F. Rogers - 1994 - Sociological Theory 12 (3):304-318.
Dialectic, rhetoric and writing: The problem of method. [REVIEW]Carlo Sini - 1990 - Argumentation 4 (1):101-108.
The U.S. farm crisis: Program responses and alternatives to them—the case of Michigan. [REVIEW]Laura B. DeLind - 1986 - Agriculture and Human Values 3 (4):59-65.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-11-07

Downloads
22 (#709,216)

6 months
5 (#639,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references