Journal of the American Philosophical Association 7 (4):549-568 (2021)
AbstractDespite growing appreciation in recent decades of the importance of shared intentional mental states as a foundation for everything from divergences in primate evolution, to the institution of communal norms, to trends in the development of modernity as a socio-political phenomenon, we lack an adequate understanding of the relationship between individual and shared intentionality. At the same time, it is widely appreciated that deontic reasoning concerning what ought, may, and ought not be done is, like reasoning about our intentions, an exercise of practical rationality. Taking advantage of this fact, I use a plan-theoretic semantics for the deontic modalities as a basis for understanding individual and shared intentions. This results in a view that accords well with what we currently have reason to believe about the phylogenetic and ontogenetic development of norm psychology and shared intentionality in human beings, and where original intentionality can be understood in terms of the shared intentionality of a community.
Similar books and articles
Following the Rules: Practical Reasoning and Deontic Constraint.Joseph Heath - 2008 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Normative Attitudes, Shared Intentionality, and Discursive Cognition.Preston Stovall - 2021 - In Leo Townsend, Hans Bernhard Schmid & Preston Stovall (eds.), The Social Institution of Discursive Norms. New York City: Routledge. pp. 138-176.
The Single-Minded Animal: Shared Intentionality, Normativity, and the Foundations of Discursive Cognition.Preston Stovall - 2022 - New York City: Routledge.
The Ramifications of Error Theories about the Deontic.Vuko Andrić - 2015 - Acta Analytica 30 (4):429-445.
Deontic Modals and Probability: One Theory to Rule Them All?Fabrizio Cariani - forthcoming - In Nate Charlow & Matthew Chrisman (eds.), Deontic Modality. Oxford University Press.
Non-conceptually contentful attitudes in interpretation.Daniel Laurier - 2001 - Sorites 13 (October):6-22.
Practical Rationality – its Nature and Operation.Andrzej Niemczuk - 2019 - Studia Humana 8 (2):55-68.
Deontic Modality.Nate Charlow & Matthew Chrisman (eds.) - 2016 - New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Modèle rationnel ou modèle économique de la rationalité?Philippe Mongin - 1984 - Revue Economique 35 (1):9-63.
Alternative Action Theory: Simultaneously a Critique of Georg Henrik von Wright’s Practical Philosophy.Ota Weinberger - 1997 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.
Deontic Logic and Natural Language.Fabrizio Cariani - forthcoming - In Dov Gabbay, Ron van der Meyden, John Horty, Xavier Parent & Leandert van der Torre (eds.), The Handbook of Deontic Logic (Vol. II). College Publications.
The Variety of Rationality.Adam Morton & David Holdcroft - 1985 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 59 (1):139-176.
Understanding What We Ought and Shall Do: A Hyperstate Semantics for Descriptive, Prescriptive, and Intentional Sentences.Preston Stovall - 2020 - In Ladislav Koreň, Hans Bernhard Schmid, Preston Stovall & Leo Townsend (eds.), Groups, Norms and Practices: Essays on Inferentialism and Collective Intentionality. Cham: Springer. pp. 215-238.
Moral Requirement and the Need for Deontic Language.E. J. Bond - 1966 - Philosophy 41 (157):233 - 249.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Modeling Descriptive and Deontic Cognition as Two Modes of Relation Between Mind and World.Preston Stovall - 2022 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 103 (1):156-185.
References found in this work
Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment.Robert Brandom - 1994 - Harvard University Press.
Group Agency: The Possibility, Design, and Status of Corporate Agents.Christian List & Philip Pettit - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization.John Searle - 2010 - Oxford University Press UK.