72 found
Order:
See also
Daniel Laurier
Université de Montréal
  1.  79
    Pragmatics, pittsburgh style.Daniel Laurier - 2005 - Pragmatics and Cognition 13 (1):141-160.
    I give a rough outline of Brandom¿s scorekeeping account of conceptual content. The account is meant to be phenomenalist, normativist, expressively complete and non-circular; the question is how and to what extent it succeeds in meeting these goals.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  2.  9
    Pragmatics, Pittsburgh style.Daniel Laurier - 2005 - Pragmatics and Cognition 13 (1):141-160.
    I give a rough outline of Brandom’s scorekeeping account of conceptual content. The account is meant to be phenomenalist, normativist, expressively complete and non-circular; the question is how and to what extent it succeeds in meeting these goals.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  3.  71
    Nonconceptual contents vs nonconceptual states.Daniel Laurier - 2005 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 68 (1):23-43.
    The question to be discussed is whether the distinction between the conceptual and the nonconceptual is best understood as pertaining primarily to intentional contents or to intentional states or attitudes. Some authors have suggested that it must be understood in the second way, in order to make the claim that experiences are nonconceptual compatible with the idea that one can also believe what one experiences. I argue that there is no need to do so, and that a conceptual content can (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  4.  54
    Intentional Normativism Meets Normative Supervenience and the Because Constraint.Daniel Laurier - 2011 - Dialogue 50 (2):315-331.
    ABSTRACT: I explain and rebut four objections to the claim that attributions of intentional attitudes are normative judgments, all stemming, directly or indirectly, from the widespread assumption that the normative supervenes on the non-normative.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  5.  1
    L'esprit et la nature.Daniel Laurier - 2002 - PUM.
    Dans quelle mesure les caractéristiques fondamentales des êtres humains, telles que leur capacité de penser, de raisonner, de vouloir et de communiquer, peuvent-elles être complètement expliquées à l'aide des seules ressources des sciences naturelles? En s'appuyant sur l'analyse rigoureuse de quelques-uns des travaux les plus significatifs de la philosophie de l'esprit, en particulier ceux de R. Millikan, F. Dretske, W. Quine et D. Davidson, Daniel Laurier révèle les limites d'un tel programme de naturalisation de l'esprit et soutient qu'il n'y a (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  6.  59
    Names and beliefs: A puzzle lost.Daniel Laurier - 1986 - Philosophical Quarterly 36 (142):37-49.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  7.  4
    Nonconceptual Contents vs Nonconceptual States.Daniel Laurier - 2005 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 68 (1):23-43.
    The question to be discussed is whether the distinction between the conceptual and the nonconceptual is best understood as pertaining primarily to intentional contents or to intentional states or attitudes. Some authors have suggested that it must be understood in the second way, in order to make the claim that experiences are nonconceptual compatible with the idea that one can also believe what one experiences. I argue that there is no need to do so, and that a conceptual content can (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  8.  1
    Essais sur le sens et la réalité.Daniel Laurier - 1991 - Les Editions Fides.
  9.  69
    What Does Intentional Normativism Require?Daniel Laurier - forthcoming - Philosophical Explorations.
  10. In search of objective agent rationality.Daniel Laurier - manuscript
    The purpose of this paper is to offer an account of what an agent's being rational to do or think something might amount to, which doesn't reduce to saying that it consists in this agent's doing or thinking something that is rational for him. In the first section, I call attention to the fact that such a distinction between agent rationality and action or belief rationality is widely admitted, I reject the idea that it could be interpreted as a distinction (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  34
    Les raisons épistémiques sont-elles instrumentales?Daniel Laurier - 2013 - Dialogue 52 (2):211-231.
    In a recent article (2011), Steglich-Petersen claims to be able to provide a teleological account of the nature of epistemic reasons which (i) avoids the standard objections to this kind of approach and (ii) is compatible with the evidentialist claim that epistemic reasons always trump non-epistemic reasons (assuming there are such reasons). I argue that his proposal is unable to do justice to the idea that epistemic reasons are constituted by the evidence, and more generally, that it is incoherent to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  12.  27
    Nouvelles catégories pour l'analyse du sens du locuteur.Daniel Laurier - 1986 - Dialectica 40 (2):87-106.
    RésuméLe sens intentionnel ?une énonciation comprend selon Grice un acte illocutoire principal et des actes illocutoires secondaires, qui peuvent être soit des implicatures conventionnelles soit des implkatures non‐conventionnelles. Je montre que cette analyse, sous ľnterprétation visée par Grice, est défectueuse en ceci que i) elle exclut que ľacte illocutoire principal puisse être non littéral, ii) elle ne rend pas compte de ce que les implicatures conventionnelles sont annulables et iii) elle confond sous ľappellation ?implicature non conventionnelle deux types de phénomènes (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  13. Essais sur le langage et l'intentionnalité, coll. « Analytiques ».Daniel Laurier & François Lepage - 1994 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 184 (4):525-527.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14. Francis Jacques, L 'espace logique de l'interlocution: Dialogiques II. [REVIEW]Daniel Laurier - 1986 - Philosophy in Review 6:227-229.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15. François Récanati, Les énoncés performatifs. [REVIEW]Daniel Laurier - 1982 - Philosophy in Review 2:187-190.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  2
    Introduction à la philosophie du langage.Daniel Laurier - 1993 - Editions Mardaga.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17. MICHEL J. BLAIS, "La logique: une introduction". [REVIEW]Daniel Laurier - 1986 - Dialogue 25 (2):385.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18. Mark Johnson, "the body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination and reason". [REVIEW]Daniel Laurier - 1990 - Dialogue 29 (3):477.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19. Pangloss, L’Erreur et La Divergence.Daniel Laurier - 1994 - Journal of Philosophical Research 19:345-372.
    The theory of radical interpretation, as based on the principle of charity, sets a priori limits on the possibility that different agents have different beliefs, and on the possibility that one has false beliefs. David Papineau put forward a teleological approach to intentional states which, he claims, doesn’t have these unacceptable consequences. Having distinguished half a dozen of different forms that the problem of radical interpretation might take, I show that Papineau’s approach is not radically different from those based on (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20. Quatorze observations topographiques sur les contenus et les normes.Daniel Laurier - 2002 - Facta Philosophica 4 (2):177-199.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21. Qu'est-ce qui est non-conceptuel, l'etat ou son contenu?Daniel Laurier - 2004 - Facta Philosophica: Internazionale Zeitschrift für Gegenwartsphilosophie: International Journal for Contemporary Philosophy 6:77-9.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22. Reasons and Supervenience.Daniel Laurier - 2017 - In B. Brozek, Antonino Rotolo & J. Stelmach (eds.), Supervenience and Normativity. Springer.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23. Le langage. Une approche philosophique.Frédéric Nef & Daniel Laurier - 1994 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 184 (4):533-536.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24.  53
    Note sur le puzzle de Kripke.Daniel Laurier - 1988 - Philosophiques 15 (1):31-39.
    Je soutiens que Kripke n'a pas réussi à montrer que certains principes plausibles gouvernant l'attribution de croyances, tels que les principes de décitation et de traduction, pouvaient nous conduire à attribuer des croyances de dicto contradictoires à un sujet réfléchi et linguistiquement compétent sans présupposer une théorie descriptive des noms propres ou des termes désignant des espèces naturelles. Les cas décrits par Kripke se réduisent à des variantes du problème de Quine concernant les croyances de re ou à des variantes (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25.  72
    The Publicity of Thought and Language.Daniel Laurier - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 32:54-61.
    I try to clarify the ways in which one would seek to hold that language and/or thought are public. For each of these theses, I distinguish four forms in which they can be framed, and two ways of establishing them. The first will try to make the publicity of thought follow from that of language; the second will try to make the publicity of language follow from that of thought. I show that none of these strategies can do without the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26.  73
    La publicité et l'interdépendance du langage et de la pensée.Daniel Laurier - 2004 - Dialogue 43 (2):281-316.
    I clarify in what sense one might want to claim that thought or language are public. I distinguish among four forms that each of these claims might take, and two general ways of establishing them that might be contemplated. The first infers the public character of thought from the public character of language, and the second infers the latter from the former. I show that neither of these stategies seems to be able to dispense with the claim that thought and (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27.  16
    Rationality and Intentionality.Daniel Laurier - 1992 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 43 (1):125-141.
    The view that in radical interpretation, the interpreter should aim at optimizing the rationality of agents is defended. A distinction and a parallel is drawn between linguistic interpretation and psychological interpretation. Both can be taken to be governed, in part, and in somewhat different ways, by a principle of rationality. Such approaches have been criticised on the ground that they make it impossible for a speaker or an agent to have wildly irrational or false beliefs. It is argued that the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  28.  31
    Naturaliser l'intentionnalité. Essai de philosophic de la psychologieÉlisabeth Pacherie Collection «Psychologie et sciences de la pensée» Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1993, xx, 300 p. [REVIEW]Daniel Laurier - 1996 - Dialogue 35 (2):406-409.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29.  66
    Reasons, contents and experiences.Daniel Laurier - 2004 - Disputatio 1 (17):1 - 21.
    I propose what seems a plausible interpretation of the suggestion that the fact that someone has or lacks the capacity to make inferences of certain kinds should be taken as evidence that the contents of the states involved in these inferences are conceptual/nonconceptual. I then argue that there is no obvious way in which this line of thought could be exploited to help draw the line separating conceptual from nonconceptual contents. This will lead me to clarify in what sense perceptual (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30.  30
    François Latraverse, La pragmatique : histoire et critique, Bruxelles, Mardaga, 1987, 267 p.François Latraverse, La pragmatique : histoire et critique, Bruxelles, Mardaga, 1987, 267 p.Daniel Laurier - 1989 - Philosophiques 16 (2):446-450.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  41
    Réponses à mes critiques.Daniel Laurier - 2003 - Philosophiques 30 (2):421-424.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32.  63
    Mind, Davidson and reality.Daniel Laurier - 2005 - Principia 9 (1-2):125-157.
    The aim of this article is to show that the prospects for intentional irrealism are much brighter than it is generally thought. In the first section, I provide a general haracterization of some of the various forms that the realism/irrealism debates might take. In the second, I ask whether there is any defensible form of realism about intentional states. I show that most candidates are nearly trivially false, and that the only form of intentional realism which is not, is a (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33.  34
    Les phénomènes mentaux ont-ils des effets physiques?Daniel Laurier - 1988 - Hermes 3:109.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34. John R. Searle, Sens et expression: études de théorie des actes de langage Reviewed by.Daniel Laurier - 1983 - Philosophy in Review 3 (2):97-101.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35.  57
    Review of Maria Cristina amoretti, Nicla Vassallo (eds.), Knowledge, Language, and Interpretation: On the Philosophy of Donald Davidson[REVIEW]Daniel Laurier - 2008 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (11).
  36.  32
    Mind-Dependence, Irrealism and Superassertibility.Daniel Laurier - 2008 - Philosophia Scientae 12 (1):143-157.
    In section 1, I explain why a specifically Dummettian conception of realism will be relevant only in a restricted range of cases. In section 2, I suggest that Crispin Wright could be read as holding that the truth of certain judgements depends on our capacity to know it only if their being true consists in their being superassertible. In section 3, I point out that insisting on knowability, as both Dummett and Wright do, prevents one from seeing that their are (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37.  47
    Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind George Lakoff Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1987. 614 p. 29, 95 $The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason Mark Johnson Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1987. 233 p. 27, 50 $. [REVIEW]Daniel Laurier - 1990 - Dialogue 29 (3):477-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38.  44
    À la défense du déontologisme doxastique.Daniel Laurier - 2009 - Dialogue 48 (1):37.
    ABSTRACT: I offer a refutation of the standard argument according to which we have no doxastic obligation because we do not have the kind of voluntary control over our beliefs required for having obligations. I then propose an interpretation of the distinction between epistemic and practical reasons for belief which can be generalised to other attitudes such as intention, and seems to imply that mental acts such as judgements and decisions never count as intentional actions, and that these two sorts (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39.  39
    La logique: une introduction Michel J. Blais Montréal: Presses de l'Université de Montréal, 1985. 234 p.Daniel Laurier - 1986 - Dialogue 25 (2):385-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40.  26
    Sommes-nous tous des épiphénomènes ?Daniel Laurier - 2008 - Philosophiques 35 (1):119-125.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41.  19
    Naturaliser l'intentionnalité. Essai de philosophic de la psychologieÉlisabeth Pacherie Collection «Psychologie et sciences de la pensée» Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1993, xx, 300 p. [REVIEW]Daniel Laurier - 1996 - Dialogue 35 (2):406-409.
  42.  36
    Making "Reasons" Explicit: How Normative is Brandom's Inferentialism.Daniel Laurier - 2009 - Abstracta 5 (2):79-99.
    This paper asks whether Brandom (1994) has provided a sufficiently clear account of the basic normative concepts of commitment and entitlement, on which his normative inferentialism seems to rest, and of how they contribute to explain the inferential articulation of conceptual contents. I show that Brandom's claim that these concepts are analogous to the concepts of obligation and permission cannot be right, and argue that the normative character of the concept of commitment is dubious. This leads me to replace Brandom's (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  43.  22
    Le programme de Davidson et les langues naturelles.Daniel Laurier - 1985 - Dialogue 24 (2):195-212.
    Une théorie davidsonienne de la signification pour une langue L prend la forme d'une theorie tarskienne de la véeritée-dans-L. Une telle théeorie sera absolument radicale s'il est possible d'éetablir qu'elle est tarskienne, c'est-à-dire conforme à la convention T de Tarski, en n'utilisant que des donnéees empiriques dont la description ne fait intervenir aucun concept linguistique, tandis qu'elle sera relativement radicale s'il est possible d'éetablir qu'elle est tarskienne en n'utilisant que des donnéees empiriques dont la description ne fait intervenir aucun concept (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44.  25
    Pangloss, L’Erreur et La Divergence.Daniel Laurier - 1994 - Journal of Philosophical Research 19:345-372.
    The theory of radical interpretation, as based on the principle of charity, sets a priori limits on the possibility that different agents have different beliefs, and on the possibility that one has false beliefs. David Papineau put forward a teleological approach to intentional states which, he claims, doesn’t have these unacceptable consequences. Having distinguished half a dozen of different forms that the problem of radical interpretation might take, I show that Papineau’s approach is not radically different from those based on (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45.  34
    Explaining Behavior: Reasons in a World of Causes Fred Dretske Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1988, xi, 165 p.Daniel Laurier - 1993 - Dialogue 32 (3):629-.
  46.  7
    Rationality and Intentionality.Daniel Laurier - 1992 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 43 (1):125-141.
    The view that in radical interpretation, the interpreter should aim at optimizing the rationality of agents is defended. A distinction and a parallel is drawn between linguistic interpretation and psychological interpretation. Both can be taken to be governed, in part, and in somewhat different ways, by a principle of rationality. Such approaches have been criticised on the ground that they make it impossible for a speaker or an agent to have wildly irrational or false beliefs. It is argued that the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  47.  38
    Essential Dependence and Realism.Daniel Laurier - 2007 - Sorites 19:41-50.
    It has recently been suggested that realism about some subject matter is best construed as the claim that the facts pertaining to this subject matter are essentially independent from the mind, in a sense to be explained, and not as the admittedly weaker claim that they are modally independent from the mind. In this paper, I argue that this proposal is liable to trivialize the realist's position and is biased against his irrealist opponent.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48.  21
    Les états intentionnels des créatures solitaires.Daniel Laurier - 1987 - Philosophiques 14 (2):229-359.
    Je soutiens qu'il y a deux façons d'individuer les états intentionnels de créatures qui sont dépourvues de toute compétence linguistique, à savoir par leur rôle propositionnel ou par leurs conditions de vérité, mais que cette distinction ne vaut que pour les états intentionnels singuliers. L'examine ensuite différentes façons de spécifier, tout en restant dans le cadre d'une conception représentationnaliste de l'intentionnalité, les conditions de vérité des attributions d'états intentionnels privés du langage ordinaire selon le mode d'individuation considéré. Il s'avère qu'une (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49.  33
    Representation and Reality Hilary Putnam Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1988, 136 p.Daniel Laurier - 1993 - Dialogue 32 (1):178-.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  50. L'analyse téléologique du contenu intentionnel: l'écueil du désir: l'écueil du désir.Daniel Laurier - 1998 - Revue Philosophique De Louvain 96 (4):624-659.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 72