Representation: Emulation and anticipation

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):418-418 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We address the issue of the normativity of representation and how Grush might address it for emulations as constituting representations. We then proceed to several more detailed issues concerning the learning of emulations, a possible empirical counterexample to Grush's model, and the choice of Kalman filters as the form of model-based control.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Issues of implementation matter for representation.Francisco Calvo Garzón - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):397-398.
Being Nice to Software Animals and Babies.Anders Sandberg - 2014-08-11 - In Russell Blackford & Damien Broderick (eds.), Intelligence Unbound. Wiley. pp. 279–297.
Is syntax a representation in itself?Maritza Rivera-Gaxiola & Juan Felipe Silva-Pereyra - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):352-353.
A developmental model of number representation.Karin Kucian & Liane Kaufmann - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (3-4):340-341.
Comments on “The Emulating Interview... with Rick Grush”.Aaron Sloman - 2011 - Avant: Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies 2 (2):35–44.
If emulation is representation, does detail matter?Lynn Andrea Stein - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):417-417.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
1 (#1,722,932)

6 months
33 (#469,376)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark Bickhard
Lehigh University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references