Is syntax a representation in itself?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):352-353 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We address the issue of the nature of representations during development regarding language acquisition. The controversy of syntax as a process or operation for representation formation and syntax as a representation in itself is discussed. Eliminating the cognitive unconscious does not warrant a simplified, more parsimonious approach to human cognition in general.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cognition needs syntax but not rules.Terence E. Horgan & John L. Tienson - 2006 - In Robert J. Stainton (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Cognitive Science. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 147--158.
Representation: Emulation and anticipation.Georgi Stojanov & Mark H. Bickhard - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):418-418.
Syntax in a dynamic brain.James W. Garson - 1997 - Synthese 110 (3):343-55.
Human language: Are nonhuman precursors lacking?Marc D. Hauser & Nathan D. Wolfea - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (1):190-191.
Human language: Are nonhuman precursors lacking?Marc D. Hauser & Nathan D. Wolfea - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (1):190-191.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
67 (#249,240)

6 months
15 (#185,276)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references