Comments on “The Emulating Interview... with Rick Grush”

Avant: Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies 2 (2):35–44 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Author comments Rick Grush’s statements about emulation and embodied approach to representation. He proposes his modification of Grush’s definition of emulation, criticizing notion of “standing in for”. He defends of notion of representation. He claims that radical embodied theories are not applicable to all cognition

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Emulation and Cognition.Rick Grush - 1995 - Dissertation, University of California, San Diego
Issues of implementation matter for representation.Francisco Calvo Garzón - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):397-398.
If emulation is representation, does detail matter?Lynn Andrea Stein - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):417-417.
Representation: Emulation and anticipation.Georgi Stojanov & Mark H. Bickhard - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):418-418.
The embodied cognition research programme.Larry Shapiro - 2007 - Philosophy Compass 2 (2):338–346.
A Moderate Approach to Embodied Cognitive Science.Alvin I. Goldman - 2012 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 3 (1):71-88.
Amodal imagery in rostral premotor areas.Takashi Hanakawa, Manabu Honda & Mark Hallett - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):406-407.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-04-28

Downloads
574 (#28,220)

6 months
67 (#57,672)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Aaron Sloman
University of Birmingham

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Critique of Pure Reason.I. Kant - 1787/1998 - Philosophy 59 (230):555-557.

Add more references