Challenging the epicureans: Death and two kinds of well-being

Philosophical Forum 42 (1):1-19 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that attempts to explain the badness of death as a deprivation to the person who dies fail to defeat the ancient Epicurean argument that death is bad for us even. At the same time, I argue that the deprivation account of the badness of death provides a way for us to understand how death can be bad for the person who dies. In support of this paradoxical thesis I invoke a distinction between momentary well-being and narrative well-being—a distinction which, while not entirely new, is insufficiently developed in the literature.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,070

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Good to die.Rainer Ebert - 2013 - Diacritica 27:139-156.
Epicureanism and Skepticism about Practical Reason.Christopher Frugé - 2020 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 50 (2):195-208.
A puzzle about death’s badness: Can death be bad for the paradise-bound?Taylor W. Cyr - 2016 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 80 (2):145-162.
Less good but not bad: In defense of epicureanism about death.Aaron Smuts - 2012 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93 (2):197-227.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-02-08

Downloads
61 (#257,975)

6 months
8 (#505,344)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Byron J. Stoyles
Trent University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Death.Thomas Nagel - 1970 - Noûs 4 (1):73-80.
Well‐Being And Time.J. David Velleman - 1991 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 72 (1):48-77.
The Limits of Well-Being.Shelly Kagan - 1992 - Social Philosophy and Policy 9 (2):169-189.
Disappointment, sadness, and death.Kai Draper - 1999 - Philosophical Review 108 (3):387-414.
The Time of Death’s Misfortune.Neil Feit - 2002 - Noûs 36 (3):359–383.

View all 6 references / Add more references