- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The role of surprise in the attribution process
Cognition and Emotion 9 (1):5-31 (1995)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
The cognitive structure of surprise: Looking for basic principles.Emiliano Lorini & Cristiano Castelfranchi - 2007 - Topoi 26 (1):133-149.
How can you be surprised? The case for volatile expectations.Roberto Casati & Elena Pasquinelli - 2007 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 (1-2):171-183.
Moral belief attribution: A reply to Roskies.Michael Cholbi - 2006 - Philosophical Psychology 19 (5):629 – 638.
Exploring the Strength of Association between the Components of Emotion Syndromes: The Case of Surprise.Rainer Reisenzein - 2000 - Cognition and Emotion 14 (1):1-38.
The Solution to the Surprise Exam Paradox.Ken Levy - 2009 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 47 (2):131-158.
On Two Versions of 'the Surprise Examination Paradox'.Leo K. C. Cheung - 2013 - Philosophia 41 (1):159-170.
Mirroring, mindreading, and simulation.Alvin I. Goldman - 2009 - In Jaime A. Pineda (ed.), Mirror Neuron Systems: The Role of Mirroring Processes in Social Cognition. New York: Humana Press. pp. 311-330.
Surprise, Surprise Gianna Petrone: La battuta a sorpresa negli oratori latini. Pp. 129. Palermo: Palumbo, 1971. Paper, L. 1,800. [REVIEW]Michael Winterbottom - 1974 - The Classical Review 24 (02):218-219.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-16
Downloads
24 (#656,974)
6 months
10 (#268,574)
2014-01-16
Downloads
24 (#656,974)
6 months
10 (#268,574)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Science Is Awe-Some: The Emotional Antecedents of Science Learning.Piercarlo Valdesolo, Andrew Shtulman & Andrew S. Baron - 2017 - Emotion Review 9 (3):215-221.
Exploring the Strength of Association between the Components of Emotion Syndromes: The Case of Surprise.Rainer Reisenzein - 2000 - Cognition and Emotion 14 (1):1-38.
Surprise, Curiosity, and Confusion Promote Knowledge Exploration: Evidence for Robust Effects of Epistemic Emotions.Elisabeth Vogl, Reinhard Pekrun, Kou Murayama, Kristina Loderer & Sandra Schubert - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
Editors’ Introduction and Review: An Appraisal of Surprise: Tracing the Threads That Stitch It Together.Edward L. Munnich, Meadhbh I. Foster & Mark T. Keane - 2019 - Topics in Cognitive Science 11 (1):37-49.
Latency and duration of the action interruption in surprise.Gernot Horstmann - 2006 - Cognition and Emotion 20 (2):242-273.
References found in this work
Towards a Cognitive Theory of Emotions.Keith Oatley & P. N. Johnson-Laird - 1987 - Cognition and Emotion 1 (1):29-50.
An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion.Bernard Weiner - 1985 - Psychological Review 92 (4):548-573.
An Attributional Theory of Motivation and Emotion.Bernard Weiner - 1988 - Behaviorism 16 (2):167-173.
An experimental analysis of surprise.Wulf-Uwe Meyer, Michael Niepel, Udo Rudolph & Achim Schützwohl - 1991 - Cognition and Emotion 5 (4):295-311.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-b9rvg uwo