Foundations of Mathematics: Metaphysics, Epistemology, Structure

Philosophical Quarterly 54 (214):16 - 37 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Since virtually every mathematical theory can be interpreted in set theory, the latter is a foundation for mathematics. Whether set theory, as opposed to any of its rivals, is the right foundation for mathematics depends on what a foundation is for. One purpose is philosophical, to provide the metaphysical basis for mathematics. Another is epistemic, to provide the basis of all mathematical knowledge. Another is to serve mathematics, by lending insight into the various fields. Another is to provide an arena for exploring relations and interactions between mathematical fields, their relative strengths, etc. Given the different goals, there is little point to determining a single foundation for all of mathematics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Set-Theoretic Foundations.Stewart Shapiro - 2000 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 6:183-196.
Towards a Philosophy of Applied Mathematics.Christopher Pincock - 2009 - In Otávio Bueno & Øystein Linnebo (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Mathematics. Palgrave-Macmillan.
What is required of a foundation for mathematics?John Mayberry - 1994 - Philosophia Mathematica 2 (1):16-35.
The foundations of mathematics.Ian Stewart & David Tall - 1977 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by David Orme Tall.
Review of M. Giaquinto, The Search for Certainty. [REVIEW]Carlo Cellucci - 2003 - European Journal of Philosophy 11 (3):420-423.
Life on the Ship of Neurath.Stewart Shapiro - 2009 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 9 (2):149-166.
Structure in mathematics.Saunders Lane - 1996 - Philosophia Mathematica 4 (2):174-183.
Mathematics and reality.Stewart Shapiro - 1983 - Philosophy of Science 50 (4):523-548.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
181 (#108,043)

6 months
15 (#164,728)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stewart Shapiro
Ohio State University

Citations of this work

What is neologicism?Bernard Linsky & Edward N. Zalta - 2006 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 12 (1):60-99.
Is unsaying polite?Berislav Žarnić - 2012 - In Majda Trobok, Nenad Miščević & Berislav Žarnić (eds.), Between Logic and Reality: Modeling Inference, Action and Understanding. Springer. pp. 201--224.
Toward the Applicability of Statistics: A Representational View.Mahdi Ashoori & S. Mahmoud Taheri - 2019 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 23 (1):113-129.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

What numbers could not be.Paul Benacerraf - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (1):47-73.
Informal Rigour and Completeness Proofs.Georg Kreisel - 1967 - In Imre Lakatos (ed.), Problems in the Philosophy of Mathematics. North-Holland. pp. 138--157.
Theory of science.Bernard Bolzano - 1972 - Boston,: D. Reidel Pub. Co.. Edited by Jan Berg.
Reals by Abstraction.Bob Hale - 2000 - Philosophia Mathematica 8 (2):100--123.

View all 17 references / Add more references