Schmitt, Hobbes and the politics of emergency

Filozofski Vestnik 24 (2):223-241 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper discusses the disanalogies between Schmitt and Hobbes on responses to emergencies, such as civil disorder. (The paper engages with literature that claims a greater common ground between the two figures than there actually is.)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,150

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Thomas Hobbes, Carl Schmitt, and three conceptions of politics.Johan Tralau - 2010 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 13 (2-3):261-274.
Does Hobbes have a concept of the enemy?Stephen Holmes - 2010 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 13 (2-3):371-389.
Thomas Hobbes, Carl Schmitt, and the Event of Conscription.Gabriella Slomp - 2009 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2009 (147):149-165.
The liberal slip of Thomas Hobbes's authoritarian pen.Gabriella Slomp - 2010 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 13 (2-3):357-369.
At a Distance to the State: On the Politics of Hobbes and Badiou.Geoffrey Holsclaw - 2012 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2012 (160):99-119.
El pesimismo antropológico y la fundamentación de la teoría del estado en Hobbes y Schmitt.Cristina Micieli - 2002 - Tópicos 10:93-120.
‘Potentia’ as ‘potestas’: An interpretation of modern politics between Thomas Hobbes and Carl Schmitt.Carlo Altini - 2010 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (2):231-252.
Le Léviathan dans la doctrine de l’État de Thomas Hobbes : sens et échec du décisionnisme politique.Emmanuel Tuchscherer - 2004 - Astérion 2.
The Leviathan in the state theory of Thomas Hobbes: meaning and failure of a political symbol.Carl Schmitt - 1996 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by George Schwab.
Entre Carl Schmitt Y Thomas Hobbes. Unestudio Del liberalismo moderno a partir Del pensamiento de Leo Strauss/between Carl Schmitt and Thomas Hobbes: A study of modern liberalism based on the thought of Leo Strauss.José Daniel Parra Quintero - 2010 - Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 12.
The appropriation of abandonment: Giorgio Agamben on the state of nature and the political. [REVIEW]Sergei Prozorov - 2009 - Continental Philosophy Review 42 (3):327-353.
Politics of Power and Freedom in the Thought of Schmitt and Arendt.Rafał Wonicki - 2008 - In Svetozar Minkov & Piotr Nowak (eds.), Man and His Enemies: Essays on Carl Schmitt.
The science in Hobbes's politics.Tom Sorell - 1988 - In Graham Alan John Rogers & Alan Ryan (eds.), Perspectives on Thomas Hobbes. Oxford University Press.
Hobbes in der Weimarer Republik. Carl Schmitt, Leo Strauss und die Krise der modernen Welt.Carlo Altini - 2006 - Hobbes Studies 19 (1):3-30.
Law as politics: Carl Schmitt's critique of liberalism.David Dyzenhaus (ed.) - 1998 - Durham, [NC]: Duke University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-18

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tom Sorell
University of Warwick

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references