Expert consensus

In Miriam Solomon, Jeremy R. Simon & Harold Kincaid (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Medicine. New York, NY: Routledge (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Building Expert Consensus on Uncertainty and Complexity in Nanomaterial Safety.Geoffrey Hunt & M. Riediker - unknown
Is It Rational to Reject Expert Consensus?Bryan Frances - 2020 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 10 (3-4):325-345.
Expert Consensus to Guide the Classification of Paralympic Swimmers With Vision Impairment: A Delphi Study.Henrike Joanna Cornelie Ravensbergen, Amarens Doutsen Genee & David Lindsay Mann - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9.
Reason Trumps All: Rationality of Minority Views in Relevant Expert Consensus (2021).David Klier - manuscript
Anti-anti-vaxx: the fairness-based obligation to defer to the expert consensus.Stephen John - unknown
Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction (The Delphi Report).Peter Facione - 1990 - Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC).
Miriam Solomon, Jeremy R. Simon, and Harold Kincaid : The Routledge companion to philosophy of medicine: New York and London: Routledge, 2017, 564 pp, $240.00 , ISBN: 978-1-138-84679-1.William E. Stempsey - 2017 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 38 (6):495-499.
Miriam Solomon, Jeremy R. Simon, and Harold Kincaid : The Routledge companion to philosophy of medicine: New York and London: Routledge, 2017, 564 pp, $240.00 , ISBN: 978-1-138-84679-1.William E. Stempsey - 2017 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 38 (6):495-499.
Consensus versus Unanimity: Which Carries More Weight?Finnur Dellsén - 2021 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
Denying the existence of consensus or denying its probative value? A critique of McIntyre’s proposal concerning science denial.Claudio Cormick & Valeria Edelsztein - forthcoming - Principia.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-10

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Miriam Solomon
Temple University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references