Abstract

The epoch of the Anthropocene is on the verge of becoming scientifically acknowledged by the science of Geology. In what way does this concern Philosophy? In this paper, we evaluate how the new concept of the Anthropocene contrasts with the classical concept of Nature, aiming to identify the territory of both. In order to do this we take as our starting point the approach of Francis Bacon which separates God and Nature. This later translated into the separation of Nature and Culture. The latter dualism is contested by Philippe Descola who defends the convergence of both. Bruno Latour and Timothy Morton consider the concept of nature as obsolete. Ulrich Beck, Erie C. Ellis and Mark Lynas claim that science will be able to cope with whatever changes the Anthropocene brings. We consider that all these claims, albeit apparently contrasting, are grounded in belief and as a counter-proposal we aim to bring to the table the concept of spirituality as essential to re-evaluate what Nature is today in the light of the Anthropocene.