Argument and Computation:1-16 (forthcoming)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
As the average age of the population increases, so too do the number of people living with chronic illnesses. With limited resources available, the development of dialogue-based e-health systems that provide justified general health advice offers a cost-effective solution to the management of chronic conditions. It is however imperative that such systems are responsible in their approach. We present in this paper two main challenges for the deployment of e-health systems, that have a particular relevance to dialogue and argumentation: collecting and handling health data, and trust. For both challenges, we look at specific issues therein, outlining their importance in general, and describing their relevance to dialogue and argumentation. Finally, we go on to propose six recommendations for handling these issues, towards addressing the main challenges themselves, that act both as general advice for dialogue and argumentation research in the e-health domain, and as a foundation for future work on this topic.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.3233/aac-200908 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
From the Semantic Web to Social Machines: A Research Challenge for AI on the World Wide Web.Jim Hendler & Tim Berners-Lee - 2010 - Artificial Intelligence 174 (2):156-161.
He Drove Forward with a Yell: Anger in Medicine and Homer.A. Bleakley, R. Marshall & D. Levine - 2014 - Medical Humanities 40 (1):22-30.
“Let Me Tell You Why!”. When Argumentation in Doctor–Patient Interaction Makes a Difference.Sara Rubinelli & Peter J. Schulz - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (3):353-375.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Argumentation and Risk Communication About Genetic Testing: Challenges for Healthcare Consumers and Implications for Computer Systems.Nancy L. Green - 2012 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 1 (1):113-129.
Supporting Argumentation Schemes in Argumentative Dialogue Games.Simon Wells - 2014 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 36 (1):171-191.
Dialectical Relevance and Dialogical Context in Walton's Pragmatic Theory.Fabrizio Macagno - 2008 - Informal Logic 28 (2):102-128.
Alternatives to Suspicion and Trust as Conditions for Challenge in Argumentative Dialogues.Douglas Walton & David Godden - 2006 - In P. Riley (ed.), Engaging argument: Selected papers from the 2005 NCA/AFA Summer Conference on Argumentation. National Communication Association. pp. 438-444.
Types of Dialogue, Dialectical Relevance and Textual Congruity.Douglas Walton & Fabrizio Macagno - 2007 - Anthropology and Philosophy 8 (1-2):101-120.
Using Argumentative Tools to Understand Inner Dialogue.Sara Greco - 2017 - Argumentation 31 (2):331-358.
The Structure of Argumentation in Health Product Messages.Douglas Walton - 2010 - Argument and Computation 1 (3):179-198.
Argumentation As Critically Oriented Pedagogical Dialogue.Chrysi Rapanta - 2019 - Informal Logic 39 (1):1-31.
Medieval Disputationes de Obligationibus as Formal Dialogue Systems.Sara L. Uckelman - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (2):143-166.
Argumentation Mining.Raquel Mochales & Marie-Francine Moens - 2011 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 19 (1):1-22.
Persuasion Dialogue in Online Dispute Resolution.Douglas Walton & David M. Godden - 2005 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (2):273-295.
Value-Based Argumentation for Justifying Compliance.Brigitte Burgemeestre, Joris Hulstijn & Yao-Hua Tan - 2011 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 19 (2-3):149-186.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2020-10-21
Total views
3 ( #1,357,542 of 2,506,111 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,984 of 2,506,111 )
2020-10-21
Total views
3 ( #1,357,542 of 2,506,111 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,984 of 2,506,111 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.