Dialectics of Labor [Book Review]

The Owl of Minerva 22 (1):108-112 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Marx’s 1844 Manuscripts have been known in the West for over half a century now. Since then few Marxist theorists have ignored them. One might think that little new remained to be said. One would be wrong. C. J. Arthur’s major study of the Manuscripts deepens our understanding of them considerably. In doing so, it also illuminates in precise terms Marx’s shifting relationship to his predecessors in the course of his early development.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dialectics of Labor. [REVIEW]Tony Smith - 1990 - The Owl of Minerva 22 (1):108-112.
Study in Arthur's thesis about Marx's Being influenced by Hegel's Master-Servant in Labor.Mojtaba Seifi & Mohammad Meshkat - 2014 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations at University of Tabriz 8 (15):59-75.
Introduction à la lecture de Hegel. [REVIEW]T. M. Knox - 1970 - The Owl of Minerva 1 (4):4-5.
Schiller, Hegel, and Marx. [REVIEW]M. W. Jackson - 1984 - The Owl of Minerva 15 (2):205-207.
The Hegelian Origins of Marx's Political Thought.Shlomo Avineri - 1967 - Review of Metaphysics 21 (1):33 - 56.
Marx's Concept of Man. [REVIEW]J. B. R. - 1961 - Review of Metaphysics 15 (1):191-191.
Schiller, Hegel, and Marx. [REVIEW]M. W. Jackson - 1984 - The Owl of Minerva 15 (2):205-207.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-15

Downloads
5 (#1,559,645)

6 months
1 (#1,721,226)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references