Schiller, Hegel, and Marx [Book Review]

The Owl of Minerva 15 (2):205-207 (1984)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Paris manuscripts made Marx’s humanism into a controversy. Louis Althusser argued that these early works were irrelevant to the mature work of Capital, while Shlomo Avineri contended that they were essential. In this book the thesis is that there is a continuous and complex development in Marx rather than Althusser’s coupure epistémologique or Avineri’s seamless web.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Schiller, Hegel, and Marx. [REVIEW]Warren E. Steinkraus - 1987 - International Studies in Philosophy 19 (3):90-91.
Schiller, Hegel, Marx and the Aesthetic Ideal of Ancient Greece.Philip Joseph Kain - 1974 - Dissertation, University of California, San Diego
Art as Self-Origination in Winckelmann and Hegel.Donovan Miyasaki - 2006 - Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 27 (1):129-150.
Terrible beauty: Paul de man's retreat from the aesthetic.Ian Mackenzie - 1993 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 51 (4):551-560.
The Communist Ideal in Hegel and Marx.David Macgregor - 1984. - Science and Society 50 (4):485-488.
Hegel, Marx, and the English state.David MacGregor - 1992 - Boulder: Westview Press.
Changing the World: Durkheim and Marx on the Ideal Society.Farhad Rohani - 1993 - Dissertation, The University of Oklahoma
Schiller, Hegel, and Marx. [REVIEW]M. W. Jackson - 1984 - The Owl of Minerva 15 (2):205-207.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-15

Downloads
8 (#1,318,021)

6 months
3 (#976,558)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references