Clarifying Conceptions of Freedom: Kaposy's Argument Against “The Inference”

American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 1 (4):34-36 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Chris Kaposy's article “The Supposed Obligation to Change One's Beliefs About Ethics Because of Discoveries in Neuroscience” (2010) targets a common “inference” among neuroscientists and ethicists....

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,475

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ideal Ethical Standards for Contraceptive Use.Francoise Baylis & Chris Kaposy - 2011 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 33 (2):19-20.
Islamic Feminisms and Freedom.Allison Weir - 2013 - Philosophical Topics 41 (2):97-119.
A Monstrous Inference called Mahāvidyānumāna.Nirmalya Guha - 2016 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 44 (3):557-579.
Clarifying the task.David Seedhouse - 1993 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 14 (4).
Rational argument, rational inference.Ulrike Hahn, Adam J. L. Harris & Mike Oaksford - 2012 - Argument and Computation 4 (1):21 - 35.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-22

Downloads
20 (#760,073)

6 months
9 (#299,476)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Freedom and Resentment.Peter Strawson - 2003 - In Gary Watson (ed.), Free Will. Oxford University Press.
How truth governs belief.Nishi Shah - 2003 - Philosophical Review 112 (4):447-482.
Freedom within Reason.Gary Watson - 1992 - Philosophical Review 101 (4):890.

View all 7 references / Add more references