Why We Don't Need a Relative Risk Standard for Adolescent HIV Vaccine Trials in South Africa

American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):21 - 22 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 11, Issue 6, Page 21-22, June 2011

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265161.2011.566671

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Relative Versus Absolute Standards for Everyday Risk in Adolescent HIV Prevention Trials: Expanding the Debate”.Jeremy Snyder, Cari L. Miller & Glenda Gray - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):W1 - W3.
The Dangers of Using a Relative Risk Standard for Minimal Risk.Seema Shah - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):22 - 23.
Uniqueness, Exploitation, and Relative Risk Standards in Adolescent Research.Janet Malek - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):23 - 25.
(Un)Risky Business: Adolescents and HIV Prevention Trials.Sean Philpott - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):17 - 19.
A Relative Standard for Minimal Risk is Unnecessary and Potentially Harmful to Children: Lessons from the Phambili Trial.Robert M. Nelson - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):14 - 16.
Reopening Old Divisions.David B. Resnik - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):19 - 21.
The Concept of Minimal Risk: The Need for Better Guidance on the Ethics Review Process.Kyoko Wada - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):27 - 29.
Minimal Risk Remains an Open Question.Ariella Binik, Charles Weijer & Mark Sheehan - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):25 - 27.
Regulating “Higher Risk, No Direct Benefit” Studies in Minors.Anna E. Westra, Jan M. Wit, Rám N. Sukhai & Inez D. de Beaufort - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):29 - 31.
Fat Chance Getting an Obstetrician in South Florida? Ethics and Discrimination in Obstetrics and Gynecology.Glenn McGee - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):1 - 2.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-06-15

Downloads
49 (#316,613)

6 months
11 (#339,290)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Risk Standards for Pediatric Research: Rethinking the Grimes Ruling.David Wendler - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (2):187-198.
Risk standards for pediatric research: Rethinking the.David Wendler - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (2):187-198.

Add more references