A Relative Standard for Minimal Risk is Unnecessary and Potentially Harmful to Children: Lessons from the Phambili Trial

American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):14 - 16 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 11, Issue 6, Page 14-16, June 2011

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265161.2011.568588

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Relative Versus Absolute Standards for Everyday Risk in Adolescent HIV Prevention Trials: Expanding the Debate.Jeremy Snyder, Cari L. Miller & Glenda Gray - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):5 - 13.
The Dangers of Using a Relative Risk Standard for Minimal Risk.Seema Shah - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):22 - 23.
Why We Don't Need a Relative Risk Standard for Adolescent HIV Vaccine Trials in South Africa.Catherine M. Slack - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):21 - 22.
Minimal risk revisited: the ethics of clinical research with children.Ariella Binik - unknown
Statistical Power, the Belmont Report, and the Ethics of Clinical Trials.Sara H. Vollmer & George Howard - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):675-691.
The Concept of Minimal Risk: The Need for Better Guidance on the Ethics Review Process.Kyoko Wada - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):27 - 29.
Minimal Risk Remains an Open Question.Ariella Binik, Charles Weijer & Mark Sheehan - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):25 - 27.
Uniqueness, Exploitation, and Relative Risk Standards in Adolescent Research.Janet Malek - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):23 - 25.
How Safe is Safe Enough?: Obligations to the Children of Reproductive Technology.Philip G. Peters - 2004 - Oxford University Press.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Relative Versus Absolute Standards for Everyday Risk in Adolescent HIV Prevention Trials: Expanding the Debate”.Jeremy Snyder, Cari L. Miller & Glenda Gray - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):W1 - W3.
Protecting subjects who cannot give consent: Toward a better standard for "minimal" risks.David Wendler - 2005 - Hastings Center Report 35 (5):37-43.
Risk standards for pediatric research: Rethinking the.David Wendler - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (2):187-198.
Why Even Inappropriate Parental Consent Might Be Enough to Justify Minimal Risk Pediatric Research Without Clinical Benefit.David Hunter - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (1):35 - 36.
Minimal Risk in Research Involving Pregnant Women and Fetuses.Carson Strong - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (3):529-538.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-06-15

Downloads
18 (#785,610)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references