Borderline personality disorder, therapeutic privilege, integrated care: is it ethical to withhold a psychiatric diagnosis?

Journal of Medical Ethics 48 (11):801-804 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Once common, therapeutic privilege—the practice whereby a physician withholds diagnostic or prognostic information from a patient intending to protect the patient—is now generally seen as unethical. However, instances of therapeutic privilege are common in some areas of clinical psychiatry. We describe therapeutic privilege in the context of borderline personality disorder, discuss the implications of diagnostic non-disclosure on integrated care and offer recommendations to promote diagnostic disclosure for this patient population. There are no data in this work.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,928

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Psychiatric Euthanasia and the Ontology of Mental Disorder.Hane Htut Maung - 2020 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 38 (1):136-154.
The Myth of Borderline Personality Disorder.John-Michael Kuczynski - 2020 - Madison, WI, USA: Freud Institute.
What is Borderline Personality Disorder?John-Michael Kuczynski - 2018 - Madison, WI, USA: Freud Institute.
Borderline Personality Disorder, Discrimination, and Survivors of Chronic Childhood Trauma.Andrea Nicki - 2016 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 9 (1):218-245.
Incest Survivors and "Borderline Personality Disorder".Andrea Nicki - 2009 - Journal of Ethics in Mental Health 4:1-3.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-07

Downloads
33 (#484,655)

6 months
22 (#122,497)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dominic Sisti
University of Pennsylvania

Citations of this work

The New Hysteria: Borderline Personality Disorder and Epistemic Injustice.Natalie Dorfman & Joel Michael Reynolds - 2023 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 16 (2):162-181.

Add more citations